Abstract

The accurate determination of electrocaloric coefficients in nanometer-thin, polycrystalline doped HfO2 is challenging and has led to very different values reported in the literature. Here, we apply two different methods in order to compare and analyze reversible and irreversible or metastable contributions to the electrocaloric effect. The indirect method is based on temperature-dependent ferroelectric hysteresis characteristics. Furthermore, we apply a direct method, where electrocaloric temperature variations are observed using a specialized test structure. A comparison of both methods reveals that the indirect method dramatically overestimates the response due to thermal fatigue effects, which are caused by the migration of charged defects to the electrode interfaces. The partial transition to the antiferroelectric-like tetragonal phase is not immediately reversed to the polar Pca21 phase upon cooling. An electrocaloric coefficient of −107 μC m−2 K−1 is determined for a 20 nm thick Si-doped HfO2 film with the direct method, which corresponds to a ΔT of 4.4 K.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.