Abstract

We compare a numerical dynamo model with a model of the palaeosecular variation and find that, although there is good agreement in the meridional distribution of the secular variation, the amplitude of secular variation in the dynamo model is too small. Increasing the Rayleigh number does little to increase the amplitude of the secular variation, while it increases the axial dipole component of the field to geophysically unreasonably large values. However, by introducing lateral variations in heat flux across the core–mantle boundary into the dynamo model, we are able to match the amplitude of the secular variation. In addition, we find that the dynamo model then exhibits persistently anomalous behaviour beneath the Pacific region.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.