Abstract
Promoting ecological health and human wellbeing are two fundamental goals in landscape sustainability. Green spaces are thought to improve users’ psychological and physical wellbeing through the contact with nature. However, the results of some studies that rely on self-reports suggest that when the level of naturalness in a green space reaches a certain point, the beneficial effects diminish and in some cases can cause negative responses. We explored this possibility through an experimental study in which we use physiological measures rather than perceptions to assess people’s wellbeing. We investigate how people are affected by outdoor settings with varying degrees of biodiversity and whether the correlation between biodiversity and physiological wellbeing is negative or positive. We used multiple measures of insect diversity as an indicator for biodiversity, and biofeedback measures as indicators of wellbeing. Our findings suggest that people are equally affected by more biodiverse and less biodiverse settings. Physiological responses remain largely unchanged when biodiversity increases. This suggests that settings rich in biodiversity will not negatively influence people’s physiological wellbeing, and designers and city planners should not hesitate to use ecological best practices in their designs.
Highlights
At the foundation of landscape architecture are two essential cornerstones of sustainability
We examine the impacts of varying levels of biodiversity in landscapes on physiological measures of wellbeing
We examined four indicators of biodiversity: richness, abundance, diversity, and evenness and examined the relationship among these measures and three objective measures of biofeedback response: facial muscle tension, heart rate variability, and blood volume pulse
Summary
At the foundation of landscape architecture are two essential cornerstones of sustainability. Landscape architects strive to create landscapes that support ecosystem health. This is a challenge in part because as urban growth surges, we see increased habitat loss, reduced biodiversity, increased pollution, and increased global warming. A second essential goal of landscape architecture is to create landscapes that support people, especially those living in cities with limited green space. This is a challenge because the demands of modern life place considerable strain on urban residents. Natural landscapes—even small amounts of natural landscapes—can help people feel relaxed and restored
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have