Abstract
As has been suggested by several theorists (e.g., Ballard-Reisch & Weigel, Chapter 22, this volume; Kelley, 1983; Levinger, 1965, 1979, 1983; Johnson, 1991, Chapter 4, this volume; Rusbult, 1980, 1983; Sabatelli, Chapter 10, this volume), it is important, given the dynamic nature of close relationships, to regard commitment as a process rather than a static construct. Thus, the most appropriate index of commitment is not its level or amount at a given time, but rather the degree of variability in commitment over time. Unfortunately, research in this area has not advanced beyond the exploration of variables that seem to enhance or undermine interpersonal commitments. What is needed at this point are programs of research that focus on the ways in which the various dimensions of commitment interact, both with one another and with other relevant factors, over the course of a relationship to promote relationship stability. The goal of this chapter is to explore more fully such a developmental perspective on interpersonal commitment.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call