Abstract

Youth crime has historically been depicted as an exponential social problem continually increasing in severity and occurrences (Muncie, 2010; Males, 1996). The extent of political and media focus on youth crime within contemporary society demonstrates this phenomenon continues unabated (Goldson & Muncie, 2015). Debates have emerged questioning the legitimacy of the preoccupation with youth crime and the influence of media and political representations upon public perceptions (Merlo & Benekos, 2017; Ruigrok et al, 2017; Henderson, 2014; Egan et al, 2013; Cohen, 2011). This paper adds to the debate by asking; is the contemporary media and political focus on youth crime justified? To answer this question, the paper initially examines evidence-based research and statistics on the nature and extent of youth crime and explores political and media representations across the last decade for comparative analysis. This leads to a central argument that political and media representations of youth crime is unwarranted, unbalanced and unjustified. Furthermore, the paper provides context of media framing and political strategizing and considers the repercussions within critical analysis of theoretical concepts of; recognition theory (Honneth, 1995), labelling (Becker, 1973) and differential association (Sutherland, 1947), to advance understanding on the disparities between media and political perceptions of youth crime in opposition to societal reality.

Highlights

  • The misrepresentation of youth crime in media and politics segregates and alienates youths from society (Neary et al, 2013) and has relevant repercussions for youth self-image and self-esteem through negative stereotyping

  • Resulting changes in newly elected governments may advocate for retributive policies or rehabilitative (Beale, 2006)

  • This article has shown that contemporary media and political representations of youth crime in England and Wales, were highly unbalanced, unsubstantiated, and unjustified between 2008 to 2018 when contrasted with figures on youth crime reported by the United Kingdom (UK) MOJ & YJB (2019) showing a decline

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The misrepresentation of youth crime in media and politics segregates and alienates youths from society (Neary et al, 2013) and has relevant repercussions for youth self-image and self-esteem through negative stereotyping. Derogatory terms associated with youth crime in media and politics such as ‘feral’ or ‘wild’ alongside the criminalisation label applied to youths have a self-perpetuating element that is internalised and reinforced as an identity, as suggested by Becker’s (1973) labelling theory. Within this theoretical framework, it is suggested that if a person believes they are wild, they will have a propensity to display that behaviour. The multitude of overlapping theories on criminality, juvenile delinquency and antisocial behaviour can make the definition of youth crime very complex (Hartinger-Saunders, 2008), due to the amount of different and at times contradictory perspectives

Extent and Nature of Youth Crime
Towards Enhancing Public Perceptions on The Youth
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call