The Correlation between Iraqi EFL Preparatory School Students’ Language Learning Styles and Language Proficiency

Abstract

Learning styles usually viewed as having a direct impact on foreign language learning. Knowing of students’ learning styles contributes significantly to the development of the level of students in the foreign language where they deal with language inputs differently and each student has a different learning style. Accordingly, foreign language teachers should be aware of the students’ individual differences in general and learning styles in particular. This study aims to find out: 1. Iraqi EFL preparatory school students’ learning styles. 2. Iraqi EFL preparatory school students’ level of language proficiency. 3. The correlation between Iraqi EFL preparatory school students’ learning styles and level of language proficiency. 4. Which of the learning styles do contribute to the interpretation of variation in language proficiency of Iraqi EFL preparatory school students. This study is a correlational research in which the population consists of 325 students from different Iraqi preparatory schools during the academic year 2020/2021. The data is gathered by employing a questionnaire to assess students' learning styles and an English language proficiency test to assess students’ proficiency represented by language skills. After their validity and reliability are verified, the instruments are applied to the research sample. The results of the statistical manipulation showed the following: 1. Iraqi EFL preparatory school students show weak level of language proficiency. 2. The dominant learning styles of Iraqi preparatory school students are random/intuitive style, followed by impulsive/reflective, while the sequential learning style comes third. While the use of closure/open oriented and deductive/inductive learning styles are not statistically significant. 3. Iraqi EFL preparatory school students’ learning styles are statistically correlated with their English language proficiency. 4. The visual, auditory, impulsive/reflective, and synthetic/analytic styles contribut