Abstract

The implementation of innovative learning and lesson study (LS) are potential to improve student thinking skills and activeness differently and mostly implemented separately. This study aimed to explore and compare the student critical and creative thinking skills as well as student activeness in the inquiry and cooperative models combined with LS-based learning practice. This was a descriptive quantitative study that was conducted at Islamic Senior High School 1 of Bengkulu.  The sample was two classes consisted of 33 and 32 students each that conducted LS-inquiry and LS-cooperative learning. The essay test delivered to measure critical and creative thinking skills and observation sheet to measure student activeness. The data were analyzed by t-test to compare critical and creative thinking skills as well as the student activeness between the LS-inquiry and LS-cooperative classes. The result showed that LS-inquiry learning improved the student critical and creative thinking skills that significantly higher than LS-cooperative learning. The student activeness improved gradually as LS cycles during learning processes in either inquiry or cooperative learning, but no significant difference between these two learning models. It showed that inquiry learning plays a dominant influence in critical and creative thinking skills improvement, whereas LS in student activeness improvement otherwise.

Highlights

  • The education quality in Indonesia is still quite far behind other countries in the world including ASEAN countries (Rahabav, 2016)

  • This study aimed to explore and compare the student critical and creative thinking skills as well as student activeness in the inquiry and cooperative models combined with lesson study (LS)-based learning practice

  • The following was the ability of student critical thinking in the cooperative and inquiry classes for both pre-test and post-test scores (Table 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The education quality in Indonesia is still quite far behind other countries in the world including ASEAN countries (Rahabav, 2016). Based on the results of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) survey through the ranking of world education related to the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA), Indonesia ranked 62nd out of 70 countries in terms of science literacy with the score 402, far below the average score OECD of 493 (Schleicher, 2018; Schleicher & Echazarra, 2016). The low quality of education is one of the four main problems of education field in Indonesia apart from its equity, efficiency, and relevancy (Kurniawan, 2016).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call