Abstract

Terrestrial laser scanners (TLS) provide an alternative to traditional field sampling for gathering accurate volumetric data about vegetations without destroying the tree samples. However, popular volumetric modeling approaches (e.g., those cylindrical methods) oversimplify vegetation structure by underutilizing surface undulations provided by the point cloud. Thus, this study aimed to test the capability of two specialized surface reconstruction methods against a traditional cylindrical method to obtain the stem volumes and masses from 3D-cloud points generated by terrestrial laser scanners under relatively controlled conditions in a eucalyptus plantation in Muang, Nakornratchasima Province, Thailand. The TLS point data were collected from the test plots, and then three algorithms, the Poisson Surface Reconstruction (PSR), the Screen Poisson Surface Reconstruction (SPSR), and the traditional Quantitative Structure Model (QSM) were applied in order to build volumetric models of the sample eucalyptus trees. It is notable that this is the first study to test the SPSR method on real tree samples (N=40). The results were then compared with the reference values measured by a water replacement method. The root means square errors (RMSE) were estimated between the xylometric referenced aboveground biomass (AGB) and the TLS three methods. The SPSR approach yielded the most accurate results (RMSE of 0.49 kg or 6.91%), while the PSR method resulted in an RMSE of 0.60 kg (8.37%). The QSM method had the worst results, with an RMSE of 1.09 kg (15.31%). Despite the occlusion problem that caused 20% systematic error, this outcome provides evidence that the use of two Poisson reconstruction methods (e.g., PSR and SPSR) provides effective alternatives to accurately quantify aboveground biomass for eucalyptus trees.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.