Abstract

Abstract Tropical forest biomass is a crucial component of global carbon emission estimations. However, calibration and validation of such estimates require accurate and effective methods to estimate in situ above‐ground biomass (AGB). Present methods rely on allometric models that are highly uncertain for large tropical trees. Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) tree modelling has demonstrated to be more accurate than these models to infer forest AGB. Nevertheless, applying TLS methods on tropical large trees is still challenging. We propose a method to estimate AGB of large tropical trees by three‐dimensional (3D) tree modelling of TLS point clouds. Twenty‐nine plots were scanned with a TLS in three study sites (Peru, Indonesia and Guyana). We identified the largest tree per plot (mean diameter at breast height of 73.5 cm), extracted its point cloud and calculated its volume by 3D modelling its structure using quantitative structure models (QSM) and converted to AGB using species‐specific wood density. We also estimated AGB using pantropical and local allometric models. To assess the accuracy of our and allometric methods, we harvest the trees and took destructive measurements. AGB estimates by the TLS–QSM method showed the best agreement in comparison to destructive harvest measurements (28.37% coefficient of variation of root mean square error [CV‐RMSE] and concordance correlation coefficient [CCC] of 0.95), outperforming the pantropical allometric models tested (35.6%–54.95% CV‐RMSE and CCC of 0.89–0.73). TLS–QSM showed also the lowest bias (overall underestimation of 3.7%) and stability across tree size range, contrasting with the allometric models that showed a systematic bias (overall underestimation ranging 15.2%–35.7%) increasing linearly with tree size. The TLS–QSM method also provided accurate tree wood volume estimates (CV RMSE of 23.7%) with no systematic bias regardless the tree structural characteristics. Our TLS–QSM method accounts for individual tree biophysical structure more effectively than allometric models, providing more accurate and less biased AGB estimates for large tropical trees, independently of their morphology. This non‐destructive method can be further used for testing and calibrating new allometric models, reducing the current under‐representation of large trees in and enhancing present and past estimates of forest biomass and carbon emissions from tropical forests.

Highlights

  • The above-g­ round carbon in tropical forests represents 40% of the total carbon stocked in forests globally (Gibbs, Brown, Niles, & Foley, 2007)

  • We present an approach to estimate tree wood volume and above-­ground biomass (AGB) for large tropical trees that relies on estimates of tree volume based on 3D data from Terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) and basic wood density

  • We show that tree volume estimation of these large tropical trees based on TLS data and quantitative structure models (QSM) provided a CV RMSE of 23.7% in comparison to destructive harvest measurements

Read more

Summary

Methods

The TLS–QSM method provided accurate tree wood volume estimates (CV RMSE of 23.7%) with no systematic bias regardless the tree structural characteristics. 4. Our TLS–QSM method accounts for individual tree biophysical structure more ­effectively than allometric models, providing more accurate and less biased AGB estimates for large tropical trees, independently of their morphology. Our TLS–QSM method accounts for individual tree biophysical structure more ­effectively than allometric models, providing more accurate and less biased AGB estimates for large tropical trees, independently of their morphology This nondestructive method can be further used for testing and calibrating new allometric models, reducing the current under-representation of large trees in and enhancing present and past estimates of forest biomass and carbon emissions from tropical forests. KEYWORDS above-ground biomass, allometric models, LiDAR, terrestrial laser scanning, tree volume, tropical trees, 3D modeling

| INTRODUCTION
| MATERIALS AND METHODS
| DISCUSSION
Findings
| CONCLUSIONS
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call