Temporal certainty of material civil legal relations. Some problematic issues

Abstract

This article is devoted to the study of the scientific question of the temporal parameters of the certainty of the protection and legal relationship that arises in the case of violation of the subjective civil rights of the person. The author’s vision of the time of existence of the law is given, in this context the fundamental difference between the concepts of "duration of the legal relationship" and "time of exercise of subjective right" is substantiated. It is substantiated that the duration of the behavior of the contractors is not always equal to the duration of the legal relationship, because the moment of the relationship does not always coincide with the moment of its implementation. Along with the legal relationship arises not the behavior itself, but only the legal means of ensuring such behavior – a subjective right and legal obligation. So, on the other hand, the time for the exercise of a subjective right coincides with the period of its existence. Given that the temporal factors in the protection of law have a significant specificity of regulation, a fundamental separation of protective and regulatory material relations. The fact is that it is not always easy to establish a temporal boundary when an intact right passes to a disturbed state. This means that there are certain problems in accessing the appropriate protective tools. Examples of such substitution of concepts and criteria for their elimination are given. The paper also provides a scientific definition of the real essence of the protective relationship, which is that in the case of violation of subjective substantive law there is a different than before, the interaction, which is protective and legal in nature. It includes the material claim of the right holder to the infringer and the corresponding obligation of the latter. It is noted that the forms of implementation of the protection requirement of the holder of the new right may be different, each of them has its own time regulators. For example, a lawsuit is filed for a limited period of time – a statute of limitations, while for operational measures or other out–of–court claims there are special deadlines, or no time limit at all. Therefore, the need for a separate temporal mediation of each of these methods of protective response is emphasized.