Abstract
Part of the “science of reading” story is weighed against the full body of evidence often ignored by the movement’s advocates— misrepresentations of National Assessment of Educational Progress data, “no excuses” ideology and anecdotes, the “bad teacher” myth, the “miracle” sleight of hand, and scapegoating/misrepresenting guessing and three-cueing.
Full Text 
Sign-in/Register to access full text options
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Paper version not known
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call
