Synergies of co-infecting pathogens, sea lice (Lepeophetheirus salmonis) and Moritella viscosa, are impacted by exposure order, and host response to initial infection

Abstract

Sea lice infestations and winter ulcer disease caused by Moritella viscosa are two major challenges for the Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) aquaculture industry. Despite their common tropisms for the skin/muscle, we know very little about the interaction between these two significant pathogens. The objective of this study was to elucidate the transcriptomic response of Atlantic salmon to sea louse (Lepeophtheirus salmonis) and M. viscosa under single infection and different scenarios of co-infection (i.e., first, L. salmonis and then, M. viscosa and vice versa). After exposure, sampling was performed from the infestation site as well as the adjacent area on fish skin, followed by transcriptome analysis. RNA-seq analysis revealed that infection with either L.salmonis or M. viscosa induced a significant immune response from the skin and resulted in extensive transcriptomic changes. More differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were detected at M. viscosa lesion sites compared to L. salmonis attachment sites. In addition, the effect of the infection order was evaluated. Interestingly, we found that primary infection with lice was associated with a significantly higher number of DEGs during the co-infection process on fish skin compared to the fish first infected with M. viscosa (721 and 5336 DEGs from lice attachment and M. viscosa lesion sites, respectively, vs 291 and 3601 DEGs from lice attachment and M. viscosa lesion sites, respectively). We also found that lice infection caused localized effects on the skin of Atlantic salmon, while single infection with M. viscosa caused a moderate systemic impact and inhibited the tissue repair function of the skin, leading to severe ulceration. In addition, the C-type lectin receptor signaling pathway was drastically activated at the lice attachment sites during both lice alone- and co-infections, regardless of the order of infections, and similar results were observed in M. viscosa infection at both lesion and adjacent sites, indicating that this pathway played an essential role for immunity in Atlantic salmon. A more intense inflammatory and immune response was also observed at M. viscosa lesion sites. These results will promote our understanding of the immune interactions between L. salmonis and M. viscosa during the co-infection process and provide insights for the development of preventive and treatment strategies for these pathogens in salmonid aquaculture.