Abstract
Abstract. Investigations of past climate dynamics rely on accurate and precise chronologies of the employed climate reconstructions. The radiocarbon dating calibration curve (IntCal13) and the Greenland ice core chronology (GICC05) represent two of the most widely used chronological frameworks in paleoclimatology of the past ∼ 50 000 years. However, comparisons of climate records anchored on these chronologies are hampered by the precision and accuracy of both timescales. Here we use common variations in the production rates of 14C and 10Be recorded in tree-rings and ice cores, respectively, to assess the differences between both timescales during the Holocene. Compared to earlier work, we employ a novel statistical approach which leads to strongly reduced and yet, more robust, uncertainty estimates. Furthermore, we demonstrate that the inferred timescale differences are robust independent of (i) the applied ice core 10Be records, (ii) assumptions of the mode of 10Be deposition, as well as (iii) carbon cycle effects on 14C, and (iv) in agreement with independent estimates of the timescale differences. Our results imply that the GICC05 counting error is likely underestimated during the most recent 2000 years leading to a dating bias that propagates throughout large parts of the Holocene. Nevertheless, our analysis indicates that the GICC05 counting error is generally a robust uncertainty measurement but care has to be taken when treating it as a nearly Gaussian error distribution. The proposed IntCal13-GICC05 transfer function facilitates the comparison of ice core and radiocarbon dated paleoclimate records at high chronological precision.
Highlights
Paleoclimatology can provide significant insights into natural climate changes and improve our understanding of the climate system
Consistent chronologies across multiple paleoclimate records are required to assess the spatiotemporal evolution of climatic events and to test for potential leads and lags within the climate system and improve the understanding of the underlying processes of past climate change
The centennial changes in the GRIP 10Be versions, are highly coherent and indicate a limited climate influence on 10Be on these timescales and the same holds true for the GISP2 10Be versions
Summary
Paleoclimatology can provide significant insights into natural climate changes and improve our understanding of the climate system. Besides the reconstruction of past climate itself, a precise chronology of each paleoclimate record is crucial to reliably assess the dynamics of the inferred changes. Consistent chronologies across multiple paleoclimate records are required to assess the spatiotemporal evolution of climatic events and to test for potential leads and lags within the climate system and improve the understanding of the underlying processes of past climate change. To be able to infer leads and lags between paleoclimatic changes anchored on these chronologies at high precision, it is crucial to test the consistency between the timescales and establish climate-independent isochrones and reduce the influence of their absolute dating uncertainties (e.g., Lane et al, 2013). One method to compare and synchronize different timescales is the use of cosmogenic radionuclide records, such as 10Be and 14C (Muscheler et al, 2008, 2014a, b; Southon, 2002)
Published Version (
Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have