Abstract
In the late 1970s, James Goodyear offered ‘a new perspective’ on the history of yellow fever in the Caribbean and coastal United States. He argued that sugar processing, shipping, and refining created favourable ecological conditions for yellow fever's vector mosquito – Aedes aegypti – by providing ready sugar for sustenance and plentiful breeding sites. Across 10 examples, Goodyear noted ‘an apparent connection in time and place’ between yellow fever ‘and the presence of sugarcane cultivation, milling, refining, or shipping’. A handful of historians have mentioned or marshalled Goodyear's sugar connection. It appears no one has tested the argument. Nor has it been integrated into the literature on other viruses transmitted by Aedes aegypti – like dengue. This essay uses an occurrence of dengue in another sugar region to test Goodyear's thesis. Did the sugar business impact the sprawling dengue epidemic that gripped Durban and the Natal coast in 1926–1927? This question is explored in two ways. First, by examining whether sugar cultivation, milling, and refining in 1920s Natal created favourable ecological conditions for Aedes aegypti. And, second, by tracing ‘sugar connections’ in time and place based on accounts of the 1926–1927 epidemic.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.