Superiority of Triply Periodic Minimal Surface Gyroid Structure to Strut-Based Grid Structure in Both Strength and Bone Regeneration.

Abstract

The aging population has rapidly driven the demand for bone regeneration. The pore structure of a scaffold is a critical factor that affects its mechanical strength and bone regeneration. Triply periodic minimal surface gyroid structures similar to the trabecular bone structure are considered superior to strut-based lattice structures (e.g., grids) in terms of bone regeneration. However, at this stage, this is only a hypothesis and is not supported by evidence. In this study, we experimentally validated this hypothesis by comparing gyroid and grid scaffolds composed of carbonate apatite. The gyroid scaffolds possessed compressive strength approximately 1.6-fold higher than that of the grid scaffolds because the gyroid structure prevented stress concentration, whereas the grid structure could not. The porosity of gyroid scaffolds was higher than that of the grid scaffolds; however, porosity and compressive strength generally have a trade-off relationship. Moreover, the gyroid scaffolds formed more than twice the amount of bone as grid scaffolds in a critical-sized bone defect in rabbit femur condyles. This favorable bone regeneration using gyroid scaffolds was attributed to the high permeability (i.e., larger volume of macropores or porosity) and curvature profile of the gyroid structure. Thus, this study validated the conventional hypothesis using in vivo experiments and revealed factors that led to this hypothetical outcome. The findings of this study are expected to contribute to the development of scaffolds that can achieve early bone regeneration without sacrificing the mechanical strength.