Abstract
Introduction: Despite the widespread use of antisecretory agents and eradication therapy, the incidence of perforated peptic ulcer has changed little. Since the initial reports of successful laparoscopic management of perforated duodenal ulcers and perforation peritonitis several larger comparative series have been published confirming the technical feasibility and advantages of laparoscopic approach. Objectives: The aim is to compare the outcome and efficacy of laparoscopic repair with conventional laparotomy in the management of peptic perforation. Methods: The study was conducted on patients with diagnosis of peptic perforation in Hi-tech medical college and hospital, Bhubaneswar. It is a retrospective and prospective study from September 2012 to April 2014. Result: 50 patients of peroration peritonitis were operated randomly by laparoscopic repair and laparotomy. It was found that the laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer was associated with less intra operative blood loss, no intra operative complications, minimum post operative complications, minimum postoperative pain which was significant as compared to laparotomy repair. Conclusion: Laparoscopic repair of perforated peptic ulcer could be considered as a treatment option in routine clinical practice in the management of peptic perforation peritonitis.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: International Journal of Medical Research and Review
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
