Student reaction to parallel hypertext and menu-based interfaces

C.K Ramaiah,Mubarak Sulaiman,A.J Meadows

doi:10.1080/0968776930010203

Abstract

It is often necessary to consider the question of what sort of interface is most useful for retrieving information from a particular land of database. A small database of text-based but multi-faceted items is used here in order to compare ease and speed of retrieval from two commonly used combinations of interface — HyperCard on an Apple Macintosh and dBase III+ on a PC. For the restricted range of tasks employed here, the latter combination appears to be more acceptable to students with limited computer experience. However, in more general terms, the acceptability of an interface for information retrieval depends on what particular aspect of information retrieval is being emphasized, and what conceptual frameworks students bring to their tasks.DOI:10.1080/0968776930010203

Highlights

Many types of interface to electronic databases exist
Any transfer effect works to the same extent in either direction.) there are differences in both time and steps taken between HyperCard and dBase m+, with the former offering a less rapid and less obvious passage for the user. (Only the difference in the number of steps is significant at the 1% level.)
The significant difference between HyperCard and dBase III+ times remains for both groups, but the overseas

Summary

Introduction

Many types of interface to electronic databases exist. they can readily be grouped into a small number of categories according to their style of approach. Shneiderman (1991) has recently suggested a taxonomy which distinguishes five styles of interaction These consist of: menu selection, form fill-in, command language, natural language, and direct manipulation. They can be used as a convenient basis for considering and comparing the properties of different types of interface. Two of the commonest such interfaces currently are (1) menu-based database management systems (DBMS) and (2) hypertext systems. The differences between these interfaces correspond to two differing interaction styles in Shneiderman's classification. The former come within the 'menu selection' group, while the latter are classified under 'direct manipulation'.

Methods

Results

Conclusion