Abstract

La Vía Campesina organisations have identified the area of education and training as a strategic and priority arena of intervention to bring about change in the political-pedagogical perspective. This involves rethinking and redesigning the conventional training processes towards the collective experiences of learning, organisation, exchange and living. With this approach in mind, and based on the experiences and educational contributions made by peasant organisations, this paper presents the systematisation of the Baserritik Mundura experience, analysing and sharing the learning derived from this case study and establishing the integral role of the pedagogic proposal as an axis for systematisation. This analysis, from the logic of the systematisation of processes, promulgates the learnings of this agroecological training experience while exposing both its strengths and weaknesses. We present the learning linked to the pedagogic dimensions that, through a cross-over method, aim to create a multidimensional educational environment which transforms our subjectivities, practices and the beliefs that sustain them. This learning is presented in eight main areas related to: (1) organicity, (2) alternation, (3) the mystical and ludic-cultural dimension, (4) the contents, subjects and teaching team, (5) the proposal as a whole and its perspective of popular education and action research, (6) the transversality of the feminist perspective, (7) linguistic plurality and (8) the pedagogic political support of the process. In addition, we present considerations related to the learning identified in the systematisation itself. On the one hand, we look at the lack of training processes in the official university context related to an alternation system with an organicity linked to the territory, and the need for the practical development of a dynamic of the collective construction of knowledge with a view toward transforming the logics that underpin the existing hegemonic ideologies. On the other hand, we point out the need for a debate regarding the epistemological perspective and integral, experiential and emancipatory pedagogical perspectives. Even with their limitations and challenges, these proposals have great potential to train, organise, politicise, excite and connect people from different fields towards the construction of a fairer, healthier and more sustainable agroecological agri-food system, based on food sovereignty and the everyday lives of people

Highlights

  • IntroductionRecent years have seen an evolution in the analyses, strategies, proposals and conceptual frameworks generated by La Via Campesina (LVC) on agroecology, food sovereignty, peasant rights, comprehensive and popular agrarian reform, etc

  • Baserritik Mundura underwent helped to experience, prefigure and put into practice the type of processes and transformations that the political proposal of agroecology and food sovereignty requires. An example of this is that the training process generated lasting interpersonal links and continuous mutual support between agents and initiatives who promote agroecological projects to regain food sovereignty

  • This leads us to conclude that the strengthening of agroecology and food sovereignty requires comprehensive training processes that cross and politicise multiple dimensions of our lives

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recent years have seen an evolution in the analyses, strategies, proposals and conceptual frameworks generated by LVC on agroecology, food sovereignty, peasant rights, comprehensive and popular agrarian reform, etc. This evolution has been possible through a dialogue of knowledge between LVC’s member organisations [6,7,8,9,10]. The official educational system trains technical people, graduates, specialists and researchers in different professional fields (agronomy, veterinary medicine, pedagogy, history, law, medicine, communication, etc.) under banking and standardising paradigms and methodologies that underpin the reproduction of the corporate agri-food system. Different studies have denounced this problem and, through these analyses, have drawn attention to the responses that LVC has put forward to meet its particular training needs from a political, ethical, pedagogical and methodological concept, in accordance with its proposals and strategies for social transformation [8,11,12,13,14,15,16,17]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call