Abstract

Education is one of keystones that guarantees well-being of a country, therefore the understanding about the educationsystem status might be crucial. It motivates to measure the state of the education system, to understand its determinants and tomonitor changes over time that would allow the implementation of evidence-based education policy. Measurement and assessment ofthe state of the education system is a complex task, as the analysis of individual indicators of the educational system is insufficient tomonitor and evaluate education as a multidimensional phenomenon. To achieve a comprehensive and generalized assessment of theeducation system, we have chosen to calculate the composite indicators, namely, indicators of resources and outcomes. Using thelatter indicators we evaluate state of resources and output of the educational system, understand the factors, determining the state, andcompare it over time and in the context of other countries. Indices were calculated for the Baltic countries and three “old” EUmember states: UK representing the Anglo-Saxon liberal model, Germany for the Continental corporatist model and Finland as anexample of the Scandinavian model. For the analysis we used 2002-2014 annual publicly available data from EUROSTAT, OECD,and IEA databases. We have employed a simple weighted additive method with equal weights and principal components analysis forthe construction of indices. We have found that the differences between composite indicators, constructed by the simple weightedadditive method with equal and principal components analysis weights, are limited. The increase in the number of sub-indicators byalmost two-thirds does not affect dynamics of the output indices over time. We have established that inertia of the education systemis different for the countries: the impact of the output on the results is observed with 2–4 year lag for the Baltic States, as there is notime lag or there is a one year lag for Germany and the United Kingdom. Finland's results are different as compared with the othercountries examined. The dynamics of the Baltic indices is similar and possibly constitutes a separate group.

Highlights

  • X14 Viešosios išlaidos švietimui - procentinė BVP dalis, tenkanti viduriniam ir poviduriniam ugdymui (ISCED 2-4) Total public expenditure on education as % of GDP, at secondary level of education (ISCED 2-4)

  • It motivates to measure the state of the education system, to understand its determinants and to monitor changes over time that would allow the implementation of evidence-based education policy

  • To achieve a comprehensive and generalized assessment of the education system, we have chosen to calculate the composite indicators, namely, indicators of resources and outcomes. Using the latter indicators we evaluate state of resources and output of the educational system, understand the factors, determining the state, and compare it over time and in the context of other countries

Read more

Summary

Lietuvos statistikos darbai

ELLI indeksas skirtas vertinti mokymąsi visą gyvenimą šalies lygmeniu, jis suskaičiuotas 23 Europos šalims (tarp kurių nėra Lietuvos), naudojant bendrą rodiklių sistemą, kurią sudaro 36 rodikliai iš Europos Sąjungos statistikos tarnybos (Eurostato) ir kitų viešai prieinamų duomenų bazių [19]. Tyrimo tikslas – sukurti švietimo išteklių ir rezultatų indeksus, leisiančius stebėti Lietuvos švietimo sistemos būklę, apskaičiuoti jų sąveiką bei palyginti laike ir kitų ES šalių kontekste. Norint švietimo išteklių ir rezultatų indeksus palyginti kitų šalių kontekste, buvo pasirinktos penkios šalys: Latvija, Estija ir trys „senosios“ ES šalys – Jungtinė Karalystė, kuri atstovauja anglosaksišką liberalųjį švietimo modelį, Vokietija – kontinentinio-korporatyvistinio modelio atstovė, ir Suomija – skandinaviško socialdemokratinio modelio pavyzdys. Toliau aprašomas rodiklių parinkimas sudėtiniam indeksui, Lietuvos ir kitų užsienio šalių švietimo stebėsenos indeksų sudarymas, aptariami gauti rezultatai. Visiems rodikliams suteikus vienodo dydžio svorius, gauname paprastąjį adityvų vienodų svorių (VS) priskyrimo metodą, kuriame kiekvienas iš rodiklių turi tokį patį poveikį konstruojamam indeksui [9]

CI t j
Išvados ir pasiūlymai
IŠTEKLIŲ RODIKLIAI
REZULTATŲ IR PADARINIŲ RODIKLIAI
Young people neither in employment nor in education and training
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.