Abstract

As renewable penetration increases in future power systems, electricity storage becomes vital to stabilise its performance. However, for electricity storage to become competitive in electricity markets, suitable price signals need to exist in day- ahead and intraday markets. This means that there is a strong need for sufficient price spread in the electricity prices of these markets. Fundamental economic dispatch models hardly reproduce the price spreads observed in real data. Thus, there is a strong need for either strategic bidding or the existence of unit commitments models, where dynamic constraints are enabled for all generator types, to achieve this level of detail. In this paper, we examine and compare these two methods to identify which model has a better fit to real price spreads. The impact of price spreads on battery storage revenues is also examined. Results show that strategic bidding of generators leads to higher price spreads and therefore, storage revenues.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.