Abstract

Across the postimperial East Central Europe, whose geopolitical space was reconfigured on the model of West European nation-states, unprocessed human residues proliferated as the collateral effects of politically guided national homogenizations. These positional outsiders, who were prevented from becoming legible within the newly established political spaces, take center stage in Kafka’s narratives, not only in the form of their characters but also their narrators and ultimate authority. They passionately attach themselves to the zones of indistinction, which the modern societies’ “egalitarian discrimination” has doomed them to, thus trying to turn their enforced dispossession into a chosen self-dispossession. I argue that Kafka’s narratives owe their elusive ultimate authority precisely to this persistent translation of the political state of exception of his agencies into their literary state of exemption. They are at constant pains to transfigure the imposed state of exception through its peculiar fictional adoption, but Kafka’s ultimate narrative authority nevertheless takes care to keep an edge over their efforts. It is precisely this never-ending gradation of subversive mimicry in Kafka’s works that his postcolonial successor J. M. Coetzee most admired.

Highlights

  • A year after the death of Emperor Franz Joseph,1 Franz Kafka worked on “At the Construction of the Great Wall of China,”2 a story which, from the perspective of an anonymous stonemason, focuses on the unification of the Chinese Empire out of seven warring states

  • The stonemason submits his report after the Great Wall of China had already been completed, benefiting from a retroactive insight

  • He and his companions were confined to a particular part of the wall that they were appointed to build and were bereft of the general view that was reserved for experts and supervisors

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A year after the death of Emperor Franz Joseph,1 Franz Kafka worked on “At the Construction of the Great Wall of China,”2 a story which, from the perspective of an anonymous stonemason, focuses on the unification of the Chinese Empire out of seven warring states. The narrator realizes, the system of piecemeal building was deliberately chosen, carefully prepared, and superbly carried out by “the high command” (The Great Wall 271).

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call