Abstract

The scientific paper presents the issue of a sports scholarship established and financed by a local government, which is a commune according to Art. 31 of the Act of June 25, 2010 on sport. Only the sports scholarship, which can only be received by the player, was taken into account, i.e. the sports scholarship for the coach was not transferred at work. The issue of the sports scholarship is a complex issue, which cannot be presented in short article, therefore the article focuses mainly on three important problems related to the interpretation of art. 31 of the Sports Act, i.e .: 1) on the subject of the subjective criterion, 2) on the issues of subject criteria and 3) the right to suspend the sports scholarship. The aim of the article is to review and assess the important views of the judicature on selected aspects of the sports scholarship for a competitor, any discrepancies, and to indicate the fields that should be resolved by the activities of the Supreme Administrative Court or legislative intervention

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call