Abstract

Spontaneous switching between cortical states in the visual cortex of cat was reported by Kenet et al.[1]: a succession of spatial activation patterns normally associated with visual input was observed even in the absence of external input. Using a Wilson-Cowan network, Blumenfeld et al.[2] proposed a model for this phenomenon that generated multistability by applying unstructured noise. Here we use the biologically realistic mean-field model of Jansen & Rit [3], together with the heteroclinic channel theory proposed by Rabinovich et al., cf. Ref. [5], to propose a mechanism how such spontaneous switching between states could occur independent of extrinsic noise. A hypercolumn in V1 is made up of orientation preference columns (OPC), which selectively respond to specifically oriented stimuli. Our model of an OPC consists of 3 neuronal populations: pyramidal neurons (PN) and excitatory (Ex. IN) / inhibitory interneurons (Inh. IN), see Fig. ​Fig.1A.1A. Their connectivity decays exponentially with orientation difference, see Fig. ​Fig.1B.1B. These decays, and the spatial layout shown in Fig. ​Fig.1C(I,II),1C(I,II), are derived from the data of Gilbert & Wiesel [4]. The interactions between the OPCs are described by integral differential equations: Figure 1 A. Basic model setup. B. Assumed decay of connectivity with orientation difference [4]. C. Spatial layout of OPCs and examples of the simulated evoked and spontaneous activity. [Θ: 2nd order differential operator, V: membrane potentials, W: connectivity, S: sigmoid function, I: input, K: gain] Evoked activity was simulated by applying input to a specific hypercolumn, yielding patterns that are very similar to the OPC distribution maps - compare Fig. ​Fig.1C(Evok.)1C(Evok.) with ​with1C1C(IV,V). Importantly however, even without any external stimulus the system spontaneously switches from one state to another, see Fig. ​Fig.1C1C(Spon.). In state space the system evolves in a heteroclinic channel, made up by the trajectories near a chain of saddle points (representing the OPCs) and associated unstable separatrixes. The inhibitory connectivity governs this sequence of activation. Imposing noise on this connectivity can introduce randomness into the sequence of activation. In this study we have combined mean-field and heteroclinic channel theory in order to describe the experimental observation of spontaneous state switching [1]. In contrast to Ref. [2], we do not need to impose unstructured noise to create multistability here. Furthermore, manipulations of our inhibitory connectivity matrix can vary the resulting sequence of states, e.g., in order to accommodate expectations about the next stimulus.

Highlights

  • Spontaneous switching between cortical states in the visual cortex of cat was reported by Kenet et al.[1]: a succession of spatial activation patterns normally associated with visual input was observed even in the absence of external input

  • A hypercolumn in V1 is made up of orientation preference columns (OPC), which selectively respond to oriented stimuli

  • * Correspondence: nguyen@cbs.mpg.de 1Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, 04103 Leipzig, Germany Full list of author information is available at the end of the article sists of 3 neuronal populations: pyramidal neurons (PN) and excitatory

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Spontaneous switching between cortical states in the visual cortex of cat was reported by Kenet et al.[1]: a succession of spatial activation patterns normally associated with visual input was observed even in the absence of external input. A hypercolumn in V1 is made up of orientation preference columns (OPC), which selectively respond to oriented stimuli. * Correspondence: nguyen@cbs.mpg.de 1Max Planck Institute for Human Cognitive and Brain Sciences, 04103 Leipzig, Germany Full list of author information is available at the end of the article sists of 3 neuronal populations: pyramidal neurons (PN) and excitatory (Ex. IN) / inhibitory interneurons (Inh. IN), see Fig. 1A. Their connectivity decays exponentially with orientation difference, see Fig. 1B.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.