Abstract

Phylogenetic models, originally developed to demonstrate evolutionary biology, have been applied to a wide range of cultural data including natural language lexicons, manuscripts, folktales, material cultures, and religions. A fundamental question regarding the application of phylogenetic inference is whether trees are an appropriate approximation of cultural evolutionary history. Their validity in cultural applications has been scrutinized, particularly with respect to the lexicons of dialects in contact. Phylogenetic models organize evolutionary data into a series of branching events through time. However, branching events are typically not included in dialectological studies to interpret the distributions of lexical terms. Instead, dialectologists have offered spatial interpretations to represent lexical data. For example, new lexical items that emerge in a politico-cultural center are likely to spread to peripheries, but not vice versa. To explore the question of the tree model’s validity, we present a simple simulation model in which dialects form a spatial network and share lexical items through contact rather than through common ancestors. We input several network topologies to the model to generate synthetic data. We then analyze the synthesized data using conventional phylogenetic techniques. We found that a group of dialects can be considered tree-like even if it has not evolved in a temporally tree-like manner but has a temporally invariant, spatially tree-like structure. In addition, the simulation experiments appear to reproduce unnatural results observed in reconstructed trees for real data. These results motivate further investigation into the spatial structure of the evolutionary history of dialect lexicons as well as other cultural characteristics.

Highlights

  • The similarity between the evolution of biological species and that of natural languages has long been noted

  • To highlight the obstacles to applying tree models to dialects in contact, we examine a reconstructed tree for Japonic dialects

  • The model we propose is a drastic departure from the tree model in that branching events are essentially absent from this model

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The similarity between the evolution of biological species and that of natural languages has long been noted. Both Charles Darwin’s “Origin of Species” [1] and August Schleicher’s IndoEuropean family trees [2] were published in the middle of the 19th century. Successful computational models to infer evolutionary history have been developed for biological data [3] and applied to languages. Such models can be extended to other cultural elements including manuscripts [4], folktales [5], material cultures [6], and religions [7]. With respect to PLOS ONE | DOI:10.1371/journal.pone.0134335 July 29, 2015

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call