Spatial and temporal variability of airborne ultrafine particles in the Greater Montreal area: Results of monitoring campaigns in two seasons

Abstract

It has been hypothesized that ultrafine particles (UFP) in air pollution may cause lung cancer. In preparation for an epidemiologic case-control study to assess this hypothesis in Montreal, Canada, we conducted a UFP measurement campaign in order to create an exposure surface with which we could assign UFP exposure to subjects corresponding to their residential addresses. The purpose of this paper is to describe the temporal and spatial variability that underlies the creation of an exposure surface in the Montreal area, and to consider the implications for epidemiological exposure assessment.We identified 249 fixed sampling sites, selected to provide a dense spatial representation of the areas of residence of Montreal residents. We conducted a winter campaign and a summer campaign, and each of the sites was visited three times during each seasonal campaign. Each visit entailed a 20-minute measurement period for UFPs with a separate measurement each second. This provided data for temporal comparisons at each site between seasons, between visits and between seconds. The median of UFP measurements was 16,593 particles/cm3 in winter and 8919 particles/cm3 in summer. Across the 249 sampling sites the Spearman correlation coefficient between the UFP measurements of winter and summer was 0.35. Within each visit, correlation was below 0.50 between pairs of UFP measurements taken more than 60 s apart, and there was hardly any correlation among measurements taken more than 300 s apart. When sites were grouped by proximity to certain types of pollution sources, and the seven resulting groups compared, there were modest, albeit statistically significant, differences in UFP levels. There was moderate positive spatial autocorrelation in UFPs over the study area. High temporal variability of UFPs from short-term measurements campaigns will likely compromise the predictive validity of the exposure surface, and will eventually attenuate the epidemiologic risk estimates.