Abstract

The objective of this work was to evaluate the efficiency of models and methods to obtain the site index, associated with ordinary kriging, to classify productive capacity in eucalyptus stands. Thus, the site quality was performed considering the traditional modeling in clonal stands (2,119 hectares) located in Minas Gerais state, Brazil. 170 plots of 400m2 were randomly allocated, representing a sampling intensity of 0.32%. The dominant height of trees (Assmann) was measured at 24, 36, 48, 60, 72, and 84 months. The site index (S) was estimated by the guide curve and algebraic difference methods, using the models of Schumacher, Chapman and Richards, and Bailey and Clutter. 136 plots were used in the fit and 34 plots in the predictive validation. The spatial dependence of site index was evaluated by experimental semivariogram and adjustment of exponential, spherical, and gaussian models. After confirming the spatial dependence, ordinary kriging was performed to spatialize the site index. For the predictive validation, the dominant height values at 72 months were used. The algebraic difference method provided excellent estimates of site index, which showed spatial dependence in all adjustments, from moderate to strong. In most cases, the gaussian model was the most accurate. It is concluded that the algebraic difference method was more efficient and the site index showed strong spatial dependence at all ages, regardless of the model used. Thus, regression models for site index estimation can be used in combination with ordinary kriging techniques.

Highlights

  • The productive capacity refers to the productive potential of wood of a certain area and species, and it can be performed using indirect or direct classification methods (CAMPOS; LEITE, 2017)

  • The Schumacher, Chapman and Richards, and Bailey and Clutter models presented satisfactory fits, with superiority of the algebraic difference method compared to the guide curve method

  • The superiority of the algebraic difference method in the construction of site index curves was observed by Castro et al (2015), in a eucalyptus stand in Minas Gerais, with the standard error values of the estimate close to 6%

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The productive capacity refers to the productive potential of wood of a certain area and species, and it can be performed using indirect or direct classification methods (CAMPOS; LEITE, 2017). Direct methods make it possible to represent the productive potential through a quantitative value, called the site index. The site index is a robust indicator of site quality, used to help apply management techniques and assess the economic viability of forest plantations, in addition to being a fundamental variable in growth and production models (LEITE et al, 2011; CAMPOS; LEITE, 2017).

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call