Abstract
Turbulent premixed hydrocarbon flames in the thin and distributed reaction zones regimes are simulated using both Direct Numerical Simulations (DNS) and Large Eddy Simulations (LES). A series of DNS is performed to study the transition from the thin reaction zones regime to the distributed reaction zones regime. Differential diffusion effects, distributed burning, and local extinctions are quantified. Different fuels, chemical mechanisms, and equivalence ratios are considered. The fuel Lewis number significantly influences the chemical source terms and turbulent flame speeds. More precisely, simulations with differential diffusion effects exhibit lower mean fuel consumption and heat release rates than their unity Lewis number counterparts. However, the differences are reduced as the reaction zone Karlovitz number is increased. The turbulent reaction zone surface areas increase with the turbulence intensity but aren't strongly affected by fuel, equivalence ratio, chemical mechanism, or differential diffusion. Unsurprisingly, changes in the integral length at a fixed Karlovitz number do not affect the chemical source terms but lead to an increase in flame surface area. Assumptions behind closure models for the filtered source term are then studied a priori using the DNS results. Using the concept of optimal estimators, it is shown that a tabulation approach using a progress variable and its variance can predict accurately the filtered progress variable source term. The filtered source terms are compared to predictions from two common presumed sub-filter Probability Density Functions (PDF) models. Both models show deviations from the filtered DNS source terms but predict accurately the mean turbulent flame speed. Finally, LES of experimentally-studied piloted premixed jet flames are performed using tabulated chemistry. Velocity and flame height measurements from simulations and experiments are compared. The LES are in good agreement with the experimental results for the four different hydrocarbon fuels and three different Reynolds numbers simulated. This corroborates that fuel and chemistry effects in turbulent flames are limited to effects present in laminar flames.
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
Filtered Source Term
Turbulent Flame
Large Eddy Simulations
Direct Numerical Simulations
Chemical Source Terms
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedTalk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Combustion and Flame
Feb 1, 2017
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Jan 25, 2004
Physics of Fluids
Aug 1, 2008
Jan 1, 2011
Combustion and Flame
Oct 1, 2018
Combustion and Flame
May 1, 2016
Journal of Fluid Mechanics
Jan 25, 2005
Combustion and Flame
Feb 1, 2022
Combustion and Flame
Mar 1, 2022
Combustion and Flame
Dec 1, 2013
arXiv: Fluid Dynamics
Apr 8, 2014
Combustion and Flame
Sep 1, 2015
Combustion Theory and Modelling
Dec 1, 2012
Proceedings of the Combustion Institute
Jan 1, 2009
Social Work
Social Work
Nov 21, 2023
Social Work
Nov 21, 2023
Social Work
Nov 16, 2023
Social Work
Nov 3, 2023
Social Work
Nov 2, 2023
Social Work
Nov 2, 2023
Social Work
Nov 2, 2023
Social Work
Nov 1, 2023
Social Work
Nov 1, 2023
Social Work
Oct 31, 2023