Abstract
Background/purposeThere is limited literature on the materials of choice and their properties when repairing 3-D printed resin-based restorations. The objective of this in-vitro study is to determine the shear bond strength of various repair materials to 3D printed SLA (stereolithography) resin. Materials and methodsFor Group A (control), fifteen cylinders of 3-D printing SLA resin were printed as one unit of a Ø6.8 × 8 mm (diameter and height) cylindrical block with a Ø3 × 5 mm cylindrical block at the center. For the test groups, forty-five specimen cylinders of 3-D printing SLA resin (Ø6.8 × 8 mm) were fabricated and the surfaces were treated with 3 different test materials: Group B: Poly-Methyl Methacrylate (PMMA); Group C: Bis-acrylic composite resin, and Group D: Bis-GMA composite All specimens were tested using an Instron machine at a crosshead speed of 0.5 mm/min. A Shapiro–Wilk test was used to assess normality within the data, then the data was statistically analyzed by a Mann–Whitney test. ResultsThere were no statistically significant differences between testing groups, except Group A. Group B displayed mixed (87%) and adhesive (13%) failure at the fractured surface. Group C showed both mixed (60%) and adhesive failure at the fractured surface (40%). All Group D showed mixed fracture patterns, partly cohesive fractured surface within the base cylinder area and partly adhesive fractured surface at the bonded interface. ConclusionNo statistically significant differences in the shear bond strength of the different repair materials to 3D printed cylinders were observed. The 3D printed cylinder repaired with Bis-GMA composite demonstrated the most predictability from the fractography analysis.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call