Sexual Selection and Variance in Reproductive Success

Abstract

Previous articleNext article No AccessNotes and CommentsSexual Selection and Variance in Reproductive SuccessMichael J. WadeMichael J. Wade Search for more articles by this author PDFPDF PLUS Add to favoritesDownload CitationTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints Share onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditEmail SectionsMoreDetailsFiguresReferencesCited by The American Naturalist Volume 114, Number 5Nov., 1979 Published for The American Society of Naturalists Article DOIhttps://doi.org/10.1086/283520 Views: 128Total views on this site Citations: 285Citations are reported from Crossref Copyright 1979 The University of ChicagoPDF download Crossref reports the following articles citing this article:J. Colton Watts, Eileen A. Hebets, and Brigitte Tenhumberg Mate Sampling Behavior Determines the Density Dependence of Sexual Selection, The American Naturalist 200, no.44 (Aug 2022): 467–485.https://doi.org/10.1086/720716Amardeep Singh and Aneil F. Agrawal Sex-Specific Variance in Fitness and the Efficacy of Selection, The American Naturalist 199, no.55 (Apr 2022): 587–602.https://doi.org/10.1086/719015Regina Vega‐Trejo, Raïssa A. Boer, John L. Fitzpatrick, Alexander Kotrschal, Alfredo Sánchez‐Tójar Sex‐specific inbreeding depression: A meta‐analysis, Ecology Letters 25, no.44 (Jan 2022): 1009–1026.https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.13961Lauren M. Harrison, Daniel W. A. Noble, Michael D. Jennions A meta‐analysis of sex differences in animal personality: no evidence for the greater male variability hypothesis, Biological Reviews 97, no.22 (Dec 2021): 679–707.https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12818Michael J Wade, Kim Hughes Maternal-Offspring Interactions: Reciprocally Coevolving Social Environments, Journal of Heredity 113, no.11 (Nov 2021): 54–60.https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esab044Anna Drake, Christine A. Bishop, Alison J. Moran, Scott Wilson Geographic and Temporal Variation in Annual Survival of a Declining Neotropical Migrant Hummingbird (Selasphorus rufus) Under Varying Fire, Snowpack, and Climatic Conditions, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 10 (Jan 2022).https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2022.825026Karoline Fritzsche, Jonathan M Henshaw, Bernadette D Johnson, Adam G Jones The 150th anniversary of The Descent of Man : Darwin and the impact of sex-role reversal on sexual selection research, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 134, no.33 (Aug 2021): 525–540.https://doi.org/10.1093/biolinnean/blab091David M Shuker, Charlotta Kvarnemo, Leigh Simmons The definition of sexual selection, Behavioral Ecology 32, no.55 (Aug 2021): 781–794.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arab055Jakob Gübel, Aneesh P H Bose, Alex Jordan, Amanda Ridley Social and spatial conflict drive resident aggression toward outsiders in a group-living fish, Behavioral Ecology 32, no.55 (May 2021): 826–834.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arab045Karl Grieshop, Paul L. Maurizio, Göran Arnqvist, David Berger Selection in males purges the mutation load on female fitness, Evolution Letters 5, no.44 (Jun 2021): 328–343.https://doi.org/10.1002/evl3.239Ryan R. Germain, Michael T. Hallworth, Sara A. Kaiser, T. Scott Sillett, Michael S. Webster Variance in within‐pair reproductive success influences the opportunity for selection annually and over the lifetimes of males in a multibrooded songbird*, Evolution 75, no.44 (Jan 2021): 915–930.https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.14166Lucas Marie‐Orleach, Nikolas Vellnow, Lukas Schärer The repeatable opportunity for selection differs between pre‐ and postcopulatory fitness components, Evolution Letters 5, no.11 (Dec 2020): 101–114.https://doi.org/10.1002/evl3.210Marcelo H. Cassini The Role of Females in the Evolution of Sexual Dimorphism and Mating Systems, (Jun 2021): 141–159.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-59184-7_7Nancy L. Rodríguez-Castañeda, Pedro L. Ortiz, Montserrat Arista, Eduardo Narbona, Mª Luisa Buide Indirect Selection on Flower Color in Silene littorea, Frontiers in Plant Science 11 (Dec 2020).https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2020.588383Cristiane H. Millan, Glauco Machado, Danilo G. Muniz Within‐population variation in female mating preference affects the opportunity for sexual selection and the evolution of male traits, but things are not as simple as expected, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 33, no.1111 (Sep 2020): 1579–1592.https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13694Evan S Richardson, Corey Davis, Ian Stirling, Andrew E Derocher, Nicholas J Lunn, René M Malenfant, Colette St Mary Variance in lifetime reproductive success of male polar bears, Behavioral Ecology 31, no.55 (Aug 2020): 1224–1232.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/araa074Juliano Morimoto Bateman (1948): was it all wrong? A comment on Hoquet (2020), Animal Behaviour 168 (Oct 2020): e1–e4.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2020.04.020Brenna A. Levine, Gordon W. Schuett, Rulon W. Clark, Roger A. Repp, Hans-Werner Herrmann, Warren Booth No evidence of male-biased sexual selection in a snake with conventional Darwinian sex roles, Royal Society Open Science 7, no.1010 (Oct 2020): 201261.https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.201261Emily R. A. Cramer, Sara A. Kaiser, Michael S. Webster, and T. Brandt Ryder Common Field Data Limitations Can Substantially Bias Sexual Selection Metrics, The American Naturalist 196, no.22 (Jun 2020): 180–196.https://doi.org/10.1086/709547Marcelo H Cassini, Michael Taborsky Sexual size dimorphism and sexual selection in artiodactyls, Behavioral Ecology 31, no.33 (Mar 2020): 792–797.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/araa017Xi Wang, Su Liu, Yuqing Yang, Lina Wu, Wenhua Huang, Renxie Wu, Guangli Li, Haifa Zhang, Zining Meng Genetic evidence for the mating system and reproductive success of black sea bream ( Acanthopagrus schlegelii ), Ecology and Evolution 10, no.1010 (Apr 2020): 4483–4494.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.6215Katharine M. Saunders, Stephen M. Shuster Bateman Gradients and Alternative Mating Strategies in a Marine Isopod, (Feb 2020).https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.88956João C. T. Menezes, Eduardo S. A. Santos, Elizabeth Derryberry Habitat structure drives the evolution of aerial displays in birds, Journal of Animal Ecology 89, no.22 (Dec 2019): 482–493.https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13132Marcelo H. Cassini A mixed model of the evolution of polygyny and sexual size dimorphism in mammals, Mammal Review 50, no.11 (Oct 2019): 112–120.https://doi.org/10.1111/mam.12171Matthew I. M. Louder, Mark E. Hauber, Amber N. A. Louder, Jeffrey P. Hoover, Wendy M. Schelsky Greater opportunities for sexual selection in male than in female obligate brood parasitic birds, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 32, no.1111 (Sep 2019): 1310–1315.https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.13537Tyrone Lucon-Xiccato, Angelo Bisazza, Andrea Pilastro Exploratory behaviour covaries with preference for unfamiliar males in female guppies, Animal Behaviour 155 (Sep 2019): 217–224.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.07.009Clarissa M. House, James Rapkin, John Hunt, David J. Hosken Operational sex ratio and density predict the potential for sexual selection in the broad-horned beetle, Animal Behaviour 152 (Jun 2019): 63–69.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2019.03.019Robin M. Hare, Leigh W. Simmons Sexual selection and its evolutionary consequences in female animals, Biological Reviews 94, no.33 (Nov 2018): 929–956.https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12484Martinus Johannes Scheepers, Gavin Gouws Mating System, Reproductive Success, and Sexual Selection in Bluntnose Klipfishes (Clinus cottoides), Journal of Heredity 110, no.33 (Feb 2019): 351–360.https://doi.org/10.1093/jhered/esz008Dean M. Castillo, Leonie C. Moyle Conspecific sperm precedence is reinforced, but postcopulatory sexual selection weakened, in sympatric populations of Drosophila, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 286, no.18991899 (Mar 2019): 20182535.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.2535Stephen M. Shuster, Regina M. Willen, Brian Keane, Nancy G. Solomon Alternative Mating Tactics in Socially Monogamous Prairie Voles, Microtus ochrogaster, Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution 7 (Feb 2019).https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00007Stephen M. Shuster Mating Systems, (Jan 2019): 274–283.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.11157-1Caroline M. Nieberding, Gilles San Martin, Suzanne Saenko, Cerisse E. Allen, Paul M. Brakefield, Bertanne Visser Sexual selection contributes to partial restoration of phenotypic robustness in a butterfly, Scientific Reports 8, no.11 (Sep 2018).https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-32132-8Stephen M. Shuster, Brandy Pyzyna, Loretta P. Mayer, Cheryl A. Dyer The opportunity for sexual selection and the evolution of non-responsiveness to pesticides, sterility inducers and contraceptives, Heliyon 4, no.1111 (Nov 2018): e00943.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2018.e00943Zahida Sultanova, Muhammed Andic, Pau Carazo The “unguarded-X” and the genetic architecture of lifespan: Inbreeding results in a potentially maladaptive sex-specific reduction of female lifespan in Drosophila melanogaster, Evolution 72, no.33 (Feb 2018): 540–552.https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13426Tim Janicke, Edward H. Morrow, David Hosken , Ecology Letters 21, no.33 ( 2018): 384.https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12907Kurt W. Karageorge, Raymond R. Wilson An integrative mating system assessment of a nonmodel, economically important Pacific rockfish ( Sebastes melanops ) reveals nonterritorial polygamy and conservation implications for a large species flock, Ecology and Evolution 7, no.2424 (Dec 2017): 11277–11291.https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.3579Tim Clutton-Brock Reproductive competition and sexual selection, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 372, no.17291729 (Jul 2017): 20160310.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2016.0310Zoé Gauthey, Cédric Tentelier, Olivier Lepais, Arturo Elosegi, Laura Royer, Stéphane Glise, Jacques Labonne With our powers combined: integrating behavioral and genetic data to estimate mating success and sexual selection, Rethinking Ecology 2 (Aug 2017): 1–26.https://doi.org/10.3897/rethinkingecology.2.14956Nils Anthes, Ines K. Häderer, Nico K. Michiels, Tim Janicke, Holger Schielzeth Measuring and interpreting sexual selection metrics: evaluation and guidelines, Methods in Ecology and Evolution 8, no.88 (Dec 2016): 918–931.https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12707Stefan Lüpold, Long Jin, Wen Bo Liao Population density and structure drive differential investment in pre- and postmating sexual traits in frogs, Evolution 71, no.66 (May 2017): 1686–1699.https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.13246M.G. Keevil, B.S. Hewitt, R.J. Brooks, J.D. Litzgus Patterns of intraspecific aggression inferred from injuries in an aquatic turtle with male-biased size dimorphism, Canadian Journal of Zoology 95, no.66 (Jun 2017): 393–403.https://doi.org/10.1139/cjz-2016-0182I. Martinossi-Allibert, G. Arnqvist, D. Berger Sex-specific selection under environmental stress in seed beetles, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 30, no.11 (Nov 2016): 161–173.https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12996J. P. Evans, F. Garcia‐Gonzalez The total opportunity for sexual selection and the integration of pre‐ and post‐mating episodes of sexual selection in a complex world, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 29, no.1212 (Aug 2016): 2338–2361.https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12960Alberto L. Teixido, Miguel Barrio, Fernando Valladares Size Matters: Understanding the Conflict Faced by Large Flowers in Mediterranean Environments, The Botanical Review 82, no.22 (May 2016): 204–228.https://doi.org/10.1007/s12229-016-9168-8Zuleyma Tang-Martínez Rethinking Bateman’s Principles: Challenging Persistent Myths of Sexually Reluctant Females and Promiscuous Males, The Journal of Sex Research 53, no.4-54-5 (Apr 2016): 532–559.https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1150938Stefan Lüpold, Mollie K. Manier, Nalini Puniamoorthy, Christopher Schoff, William T. Starmer, Shannon H. Buckley Luepold, John M. Belote, Scott Pitnick How sexual selection can drive the evolution of costly sperm ornamentation, Nature 533, no.76047604 (May 2016): 535–538.https://doi.org/10.1038/nature18005Amy L. Dapper, Michael J. Wade The evolution of sperm competition genes: The effect of mating system on levels of genetic variation within and between species, Evolution 70, no.22 (Feb 2016): 502–511.https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12848A.G. Jones Sexual Selection, Theory of, (Jan 2016): 119–127.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800049-6.00151-7S.M. Shuster Operational Sex Ratio, (Jan 2016): 167–174.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800049-6.00153-0E.J. Herridge, R.L. Murray, D.T. Gwynne, L.F. Bussière Mating and Parental Sex Roles, Diversity in, (Jan 2016): 453–458.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800049-6.00154-2Robert B. Prather, Stephen M. Shuster, Marco Festa-Bianchet The Opportunity for Post-Copulatory Sexual Selection in the Ectoparasitic Pea Crab, Dissodactylus primitivus (Brachyura: Pinnotheridae), PLOS ONE 10, no.1212 (Dec 2015): e0145681.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0145681Huateng Huang, Daniel L. Rabosky Sex-linked genomic variation and its relationship to avian plumage dichromatism and sexual selection, BMC Evolutionary Biology 15, no.11 (Sep 2015).https://doi.org/10.1186/s12862-015-0480-4Shahrina Chowdhury, Mathew Pines, Julian Saunders, Larissa Swedell The adaptive value of secondary males in the polygynous multi-level society of hamadryas baboons, American Journal of Physical Anthropology 158, no.33 (Jul 2015): 501–513.https://doi.org/10.1002/ajpa.22804Adam G. Jones batemanater : a computer program to estimate and bootstrap mating system variables based on Bateman's principles, Molecular Ecology Resources 15, no.66 (Mar 2015): 1396–1402.https://doi.org/10.1111/1755-0998.12397Kristina M. Durante, Vladas Griskevicius, Joseph P. Redden, Andrew Edward White Spending on Daughters versus Sons in Economic Recessions, Journal of Consumer Research 42, no.33 (May 2015): 435–457.https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucv023Rebecca Dean, Peter W. Harrison, Alison E. Wright, Fabian Zimmer, Judith E. Mank Positive Selection Underlies Faster-Z Evolution of Gene Expression in Birds, Molecular Biology and Evolution 32, no.1010 (Jun 2015): 2646–2656.https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msv138Alison Pischedda, Urban Friberg, Andrew D. Stewart, Paige M. Miller, William R. Rice Sexual selection has minimal impact on effective population sizes in species with high rates of random offspring mortality: An empirical demonstration using fitness distributions, Evolution 69, no.1010 (Sep 2015): 2638–2647.https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12764Chase L. Nuñez, Mark N. Grote, Michelle Wechsler, Cary R. Allen-Blevins, Katie Hinde Offspring of primiparous mothers do not experience greater mortality or poorer growth: Revisiting the conventional wisdom with archival records of Rhesus Macaques, American Journal of Primatology 77, no.99 (Jun 2015): 963–973.https://doi.org/10.1002/ajp.22426Jason Collins, Boris Baer, Ernst Juerg Weber Sexual selection, conspicuous consumption and economic growth, Journal of Bioeconomics 17, no.22 (May 2015): 189–206.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10818-015-9200-9Tim Janicke, Patrice David, Elodie Chapuis, Environment-Dependent Sexual Selection: Bateman’s Parameters under Varying Levels of Food Availability, The American Naturalist 185, no.66 (Oct 2015): 756–768.https://doi.org/10.1086/681128Charles F. Smith, Gordon W. Schuett, Melissa Amarello Male mating success in a North American pitviper: influence of body size, testosterone, and spatial metrics, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 115, no.11 (Feb 2015): 185–194.https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12490Sharon Renan, Gili Greenbaum, Naama Shahar, Alan R. Templeton, Amos Bouskila, Shirli Bar-David Stochastic modelling of shifts in allele frequencies reveals a strongly polygynous mating system in the re-introduced Asiatic wild ass, Molecular Ecology 24, no.77 (Mar 2015): 1433–1446.https://doi.org/10.1111/mec.13131Courtney L. Fitzpatrick, M. Hauber Expanding Sexual Selection Gradients; A Synthetic Refinement of Sexual Selection Theory, Ethology 121, no.33 (Jan 2015): 207–217.https://doi.org/10.1111/eth.12352Brenna A. Levine, Charles F. Smith, Gordon W. Schuett, Marlis R. Douglas, Mark A. Davis, Michael E. Douglas Bateman-Trivers in the 21st Century: sexual selection in a North American pitviper, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 114, no.22 (Nov 2014): 436–445.https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12434Tina W. Wey, Ann T. Chang, Sean Fogarty, Andrew Sih Personalities and presence of hyperaggressive males influence male mating exclusivity and effective mating in stream water striders, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 69, no.11 (Sep 2014): 27–37.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-014-1814-8Miguel Barrio, Alberto L. Teixido Sex-dependent selection on flower size in a large-flowered Mediterranean species: an experimental approach with Cistus ladanifer, Plant Systematics and Evolution 301, no.11 (Apr 2014): 113–124.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-014-1058-0Elise Rioux-Paquette, Dany Garant, Alexandre M. Martin, Graeme Coulson, Marco Festa-Bianchet Paternity in eastern grey kangaroos: moderate skew despite strong sexual dimorphism, Behavioral Ecology 26, no.44 (Apr 2015): 1147–1155.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arv052A. M. Martin, M. Festa-Bianchet, D. W. Coltman, F. Pelletier Comparing measures of breeding inequality and opportunity for selection with sexual selection on a quantitative character in bighorn rams, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 28, no.11 (Dec 2014): 223–230.https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12558Emily J. Miner, Michael Gurven, Hillard Kaplan, Steven J. C. Gaulin Sex difference in travel is concentrated in adolescence and tracks reproductive interests, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281, no.17961796 (Dec 2014): 20141476.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2014.1476Stephen M. Shuster Why males and females look different, Evolution 68, no.1212 (Oct 2014): 3644–3645.https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12521Michael J. Wade Genotype-by-Environment Interactions and Sexual Selection: Female Choice in a Complex World, (Aug 2014): 1–18.https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118912591.ch1C. Dubuc, A. Ruiz-Lambides, A. Widdig Variance in male lifetime reproductive success and estimation of the degree of polygyny in a primate, Behavioral Ecology 25, no.44 (Apr 2014): 878–889.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru052Julie M. Collet, Rebecca F. Dean, Kirsty Worley, David S. Richardson, Tommaso Pizzari The measure and significance of Bateman's principles, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281, no.17821782 (May 2014): 20132973.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.2973Ryan Schacht, Kristin Liv Rauch, Monique Borgerhoff Mulder Too many men: the violence problem?, Trends in Ecology & Evolution 29, no.44 (Apr 2014): 214–222.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2014.02.001Jacob A. Moorad Individual fitness and phenotypic selection in age-structured populations with constant growth rates, Ecology 95, no.44 (Apr 2014): 1087–1095.https://doi.org/10.1890/13-0778.1Y. Nakadera, C. Blom, J. M. Koene Duration of sperm storage in the simultaneous hermaphrodite Lymnaea stagnalis, Journal of Molluscan Studies 80, no.11 (Jan 2014): 1–7.https://doi.org/10.1093/mollus/eyt049Diddahally R. Govindaraju Opportunity for Selection in Human Health, (Jan 2014): 1–70.https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-800149-3.00001-9Vicente García-Navas, Esperanza S. Ferrer, Javier Bueno-Enciso, Rafael Barrientos, Juan José Sanz, Joaquín Ortego Extrapair paternity in Mediterranean blue tits: socioecological factors and the opportunity for sexual selection, Behavioral Ecology 25, no.11 (Dec 2013): 228–238.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/art111Karen M. Cogliati, Allison F. Mistakidis, Julie R. Marentette, Adrienne Lau, Benjamin M. Bolker, Bryan D. Neff, Sigal Balshine Comparing population level sexual selection in a species with alternative reproductive tactics, Behavioral Ecology 25, no.66 (Sep 2014): 1524–1533.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/aru147Charles Mullon, Max Reuter, Laurent Lehmann The Evolution and Consequences of Sex-Specific Reproductive Variance, Genetics 196, no.11 (Jan 2014): 235–252.https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.113.156067Ulrika Candolin, Leon Vlieger Estimating the Dynamics of Sexual Selection in Changing Environments, Evolutionary Biology 40, no.44 (Apr 2013): 589–600.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11692-013-9234-7Hitoshi Koyano, Dimitar Serbezov, Hirohisa Kishino, Tore Schweder Fractional parentage analysis and a scale-free reproductive network of brown trout, Journal of Theoretical Biology 336 (Nov 2013): 18–35.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2013.06.038Jui-Hua Chu, Daniel Wegmann, Chia-Fen Yeh, Rong-Chien Lin, Xiao-Jun Yang, Fu-Min Lei, Cheng-Te Yao, Fa-Sheng Zou, Shou-Hsien Li Inferring the Geographic Mode of Speciation by Contrasting Autosomal and Sex-Linked Genetic Diversity, Molecular Biology and Evolution 30, no.1111 (Aug 2013): 2519–2530.https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/mst140Tonje Aronsen, Anders Berglund, Kenyon B. Mobley, Irja I. Ratikainen, Gunilla Rosenqvist SEX RATIO AND DENSITY AFFECT SEXUAL SELECTION IN A SEX-ROLE REVERSED FISH, Evolution 67, no.1111 (Jul 2013): 3243–3257.https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12201Rafael Rios Moura, Paulo Enrique Cardoso Peixoto The effect of operational sex ratio on the opportunity for sexual selection: a meta-analysis, Animal Behaviour 86, no.44 (Oct 2013): 675–683.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2013.07.002Emily Rose, Kimberly A. Paczolt, and Adam G. Jones The Contributions of Premating and Postmating Selection Episodes to Total Selection in Sex-Role-Reversed Gulf Pipefish., The American Naturalist 182, no.33 (Jul 2015): 410–420.https://doi.org/10.1086/671233Ingela Alger, Donald Cox The evolution of altruistic preferences: mothers versus fathers, Review of Economics of the Household 11, no.33 (Jun 2013): 421–446.https://doi.org/10.1007/s11150-013-9201-1DAVID PUNZALAN, LOCKE ROWE Ecological correlates of daily mating frequency in a wild population of ambush bugs, Ecological Entomology 38, no.44 (Apr 2013): 429–432.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2311.2013.01407.xKaroline Fritzsche, Göran Arnqvist HOMAGE TO BATEMAN: SEX ROLES PREDICT SEX DIFFERENCES IN SEXUAL SELECTION, Evolution 67, no.77 (Apr 2013): 1926–1936.https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12086Sebastian Wacker, Kenyon Mobley, Elisabet Forsgren, Lise Cats Myhre, Karen de Jong, Trond Amundsen OPERATIONAL SEX RATIO BUT NOT DENSITY AFFECTS SEXUAL SELECTION IN A FISH, Evolution 67, no.77 (Apr 2013): 1937–1949.https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12092Jacob A. Moorad A DEMOGRAPHIC TRANSITION ALTERED THE STRENGTH OF SELECTION FOR FITNESS AND AGE-SPECIFIC SURVIVAL AND FERTILITY IN A 19TH CENTURY AMERICAN POPULATION, Evolution 67, no.66 (Jan 2013): 1622–1634.https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12023Jacob A. Moorad MULTI-LEVEL SEXUAL SELECTION: INDIVIDUAL AND FAMILY-LEVEL SELECTION FOR MATING SUCCESS IN A HISTORICAL HUMAN POPULATION, Evolution 67, no.66 (Feb 2013): 1635–1648.https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12050Andrea E. Zikovitz, Aneil F. Agrawal THE CONDITION DEPENDENCY OF FITNESS IN MALES AND FEMALES: THE FITNESS CONSEQUENCES OF JUVENILE DIET ASSESSED IN ENVIRONMENTS DIFFERING IN KEY ADULT RESOURCES, Evolution 25 (Jun 2013): n/a–n/a.https://doi.org/10.1111/evo.12170Isabel Mück, Sebastian Wacker, Lise Cats Myhre, Trond Amundsen Nest distribution affects behaviour and mating success in a marine fish, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 67, no.44 (Jan 2013): 609–619.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-013-1480-2Stephen M. Shuster, William R. Briggs, Patricia A. Dennis How multiple mating by females affects sexual selection, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 368, no.16131613 (Mar 2013): 20120046.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0046Geoff A. Parker, Tim R. Birkhead Polyandry: the history of a revolution, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 368, no.16131613 (Mar 2013): 20120335.https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2012.0335Jacob A. Moorad and Michael J. Wade Selection Gradients, the Opportunity for Selection, and the Coefficient of Determination., The American Naturalist 181, no.33 (Jul 2015): 291–300.https://doi.org/10.1086/669158Kenyon B. Mobley, Adam G. Jones OVERCOMING STATISTICAL BIAS TO ESTIMATE GENETIC MATING SYSTEMS IN OPEN POPULATIONS: A COMPARISON OF BATEMAN'S PRINCIPLES BETWEEN THE SEXES IN A SEX-ROLE-REVERSED PIPEFISH, Evolution 67, no.33 (Oct 2012): 646–660.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2012.01819.xDidrik Vanhoenacker, Jon Ågren, Johan Ehrlén, Peter Thrall Non-linear relationship between intensity of plant-animal interactions and selection strength, Ecology Letters 16, no.22 (Nov 2012): 198–205.https://doi.org/10.1111/ele.12029Lise Cats Myhre, Elisabet Forsgren, Trond Amundsen Effects of habitat complexity on mating behavior and mating success in a marine fish, Behavioral Ecology 24, no.22 (Nov 2012): 553–563.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ars197Bridget F. Sousa, David F. Westneat Variance in mating success does not produce strong sexual selection in a polygynous songbird, Behavioral Ecology 24, no.66 (Aug 2013): 1381–1389.https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/art077Michael J. Wade Constraints on Sexual Selection, Science 338, no.61086108 (Nov 2012): 749–750.https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230395A. Runemark, M. Wellenreuther, H. H. E. Jayaweera, S. Svanberg, M. Brydegaard Rare Events in Remote Dark-Field Spectroscopy: An Ecological Case Study of Insects, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics 18, no.55 (Sep 2012): 1573–1582.https://doi.org/10.1109/JSTQE.2012.2184528D. M. Drown, K. M. Preuss, M. J. Wade Evidence of a Paucity of Genes That Interact with the Mitochondrion on the X in Mammals, Genome Biology and Evolution 4, no.88 (Jul 2012): 763–768.https://doi.org/10.1093/gbe/evs064Martha Lucía Baena, Rogelio Macías-Ordóñez, Mark Briffa Phenology of Scramble Polygyny in a Wild Population of Chrysolemid Beetles: The Opportunity for and the Strength of Sexual Selection, PLoS ONE 7, no.66 (Jun 2012): e38315.https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0038315Julie Collet, David S. Richardson, Kirsty Worley, Tommaso Pizzari Sexual selection and the differential effect of polyandry, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 109, no.2222 (May 2012): 8641–8645.https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1200219109Stacey J. Dunn, Lisette P. Waits, and John A. Byers Genetic versus Census Estimators of the Opportunity for Sexual Selection in the Wild., The American Naturalist 179, no.44 (Jul 2015): 451–462.https://doi.org/10.1086/664626M. D. JENNIONS, H. KOKKO, H. KLUG The opportunity to be misled in studies of sexual selection, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 25, no.33 (Jan 2012): 591–598.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02451.xE. HEYER, R. CHAIX, S. PAVARD, F. AUSTERLITZ Sex-specific demographic behaviours that shape human genomic variation, Molecular Ecology 21, no.33 (Dec 2011): 597–612.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2011.05406.xBenjamin Pélissié, Philippe Jarne, Patrice David SEXUAL SELECTION WITHOUT SEXUAL DIMORPHISM: BATEMAN GRADIENTS IN A SIMULTANEOUS HERMAPHRODITE, Evolution 66, no.11 (Nov 2011): 66–81.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01442.xErnst Juerg Weber, Jason Collins, Boris Baer Sexual Selection, Conspicuous Consumption and Economic Growth, SSRN Electronic Journal (Jan 2012).https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2111740Jakob Bro-Jørgensen Queuing in space and time reduces the lek paradox on an antelope lek, Evolutionary Ecology 25, no.66 (Sep 2011): 1385–1395.https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-011-9523-5Karen E. Munroe, John L. Koprowski Sociality, Bateman’s gradients, and the polygynandrous genetic mating system of round-tailed ground squirrels (Xerospermophilus tereticaudus), Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65, no.99 (Apr 2011): 1811–1824.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1189-zA. H. KRAKAUER, M. S. WEBSTER, E. H. DUVAL, A. G. JONES, S. M. SHUSTER The opportunity for sexual selection: not mismeasured, just misunderstood, Journal of Evolutionary Biology 24, no.99 (Jun 2011): 2064–2071.https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1420-9101.2011.02317.xPatrick S. Fitze and Jean-François Le Galliard Inconsistency between Different Measures of Sexual Selection., The American Naturalist 178, no.22 (Jul 2015): 256–268.https://doi.org/10.1086/660826Felipe S. Barreto, John C. Avise The genetic mating system of a sea spider with male-biased sexual size dimorphism: evidence for paternity skew despite random mating success, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 65, no.88 (Mar 2011): 1595–1604.https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-011-1170-xA F Agrawal Are males the more ‘sensitive’ sex?, Heredity 107, no.11 (Dec 2010): 20–21.https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2010.156Jakob Bro‐Jørgensen Sexual Selection and Female Competition, (May 2011).https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470015902.a0023305Jeffrey E. Lane, Maura N.K. Forrest, Craig K.R. Willis Anthropogenic influences on natural animal mating systems, Animal Behaviour 81, no.55 (May 2011): 909–917.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2011.02.003Jacob A. Moorad, Daniel E.L. Promislow, Ken R. Smith, Michael J. Wade Mating system change reduces the strength of sexual selection in an American frontier population of the 19th century, Evolution and Human Behavior 32, no.22 (Mar 2011): 147–155.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.10.004Emmi Schlicht, Bart Kempenaers Extra-Pair Paternity and Sexual Selection, (Jan 2011): 35–65.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-4-431-53892-9_2M J Wade, S M Shuster Bateman (1948): pioneer in the measurement of sexual selection, Heredity 105, no.66 (Feb 2010): 507–508.https://doi.org/10.1038/hdy.2010.8Felipe S. Barreto, John C. Avise Quantitative measures of sexual selection reveal no evidence for sex-role reversal in a sea spider with prolonged paternal care, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 277, no.16961696 (May 2010): 2951–2956.https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2010.0311Nils Anthes