Abstract

Due to the high spatial and temporal variability of atmospheric water vapor associated with the deficient methodologies used in its quantification and the imperfect physics parameterizations incorporated in the models, there are significant uncertainties in characterizing the moisture field. The process responsible for incorporating the information provided by observation into the numerical weather prediction is denominated data assimilation. The best result in atmospheric moisture depend on the correct choice of the moisture control variable. Normalized relative humidity and pseudo-relative humidity are the variables usually used by the main weather prediction centers. The objective of this study is to assess the sensibility of the Center for Weather Forecast and Climate Studies to choose moisture control variable in the data assimilation scheme. Experiments using these variables are carried out. The results show that the pseudo-relative humidity improves the variables that depend on temperature values but damage the moisture field. The opposite results show when the simulation used the normalized relative humidity. These experiments suggest that the pseudo-relative humidity should be used in the cyclical process of data assimilation and the normalized relative humidity should be used in non-cyclic process (e.g., nowcasting application in high resolution).

Highlights

  • The atmospheric moisture field presents variation of high and low frequencies

  • The sensibility of initial conditions for selecting moisture control variables in the assimilation was verified through the initial conditions of the mean fields of zonal wind at 200 hPa (U200 hPa), hPa geopotential height (Z500 hPa), mean sea level pressure (MSLP), and precipitable water (PW)

  • Greater differences were noted between normalized RH (NRH) and pseudo-RH (PRH)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The atmospheric moisture field presents variation of high and low frequencies. These frequencies depend directly on the heating of the terrestrial surface and indirectly on some variability patterns of low frequency by teleconnection [1,2]. The space field presents variability associated with wind, topography and surfaces types. Wind changes moisture by advectives or recycling processes. Topography is responsible for large amount of water vapor moving windward of the mountain, and small amount moving downwind. The plane and coastal surfaces present a larger storage of water vapor than continental areas [3,4]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.