Abstract
The May 1972 issue of the Mathematics Teacher contained eight articles dealing with individualizing mathematics instruction. Most of the articles discussed a modular, self-paced approach to individualization. Since that time a substantial amount of research testing the effectiveness of such programs has been reported. This paper is a review of studies comparing self-paced, individualized programs with other teaching approaches at the secondary and post-secondary levels. A recent review of similar studies conducted with elementary school students showed that the results were overwhelmingly against individualized instruction as measured by mathematics achievement, with some ambiguity on attitude and other affective measures (Schoen 1975). Do these negative findings continue into secondary school and beyond? Mathematics teachers at these levels will find the results summarized here very informative, especially if they are considering adopting an individualized program.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.