Abstract

ETS Research Bulletin SeriesVolume 1955, Issue 2 p. i-165 ArticleFree Access A SURVEY OF MATHEMATICAL EDUCATION The Causes of Student Dropout, Failure, and Incompetence at the Elementary and Secondary Levels First published: December 1955 https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2333-8504.1955.tb00931.xAboutPDF ToolsRequest permissionExport citationAdd to favoritesTrack citation ShareShare Give accessShare full text accessShare full-text accessPlease review our Terms and Conditions of Use and check box below to share full-text version of article.I have read and accept the Wiley Online Library Terms and Conditions of UseShareable LinkUse the link below to share a full-text version of this article with your friends and colleagues. Learn more.Copy URL Share a linkShare onFacebookTwitterLinkedInRedditWechat BIBLIOGRAPHY 1Adkins, J. B. A mathematics program for grade XII. In Emerging Practices in Mathematics Education, Twenty-second Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Washington, D. C.: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1954. Pp. 41– 44. 2Anderson, G. L. Quantitative thinking as developed under connectionist and field theories of learning. In Learning Theory in School Situations. University of Minnesota Studies in Education, No. 2. Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press, 1949. Pp. 40– 73. 3Anderson, H. J. Correlation between academic achievement and teaching success. Elem. Sch. J., 1931, 32, 22– 29. 4Anderson, H. M. A study of certain criteria of teaching effectiveness. J. exp. Educ., September 1954, 23, 41– 71. 5Archer, A. Teaching plane geometry to mentally, physically, and emotionally handicapped pupils. Math. Tchr., March 1951, 44, 183– 185. 6Arthur, L. E. Diagnosis of disabilities in arithmetic essentials. Math. Tchr., May 1950, 43, 197– 202. 7Ayre, H. G. On the status of teacher load, salary, and professional preparation of junior college mathematics teachers. Math. Tchr., February 1950, 43, 54– 60. 8Barakat, M. K. A factorial study of math abilities. Brit. J. Psychol., Stat. Sec., November 1951, 4, 137– 156. 9Barr, A. S. The measurement and prediction of teaching efficiency: A summary of investigations. J. exp. Educ., June 1948, 16, 203– 283. 10Barr, A. S., Burton, W. H., and Brueckner, L. J. Supervision: Democratic Leadership in the Improvement of Learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1947. 11Baumgartner, R. E. A differentiated curriculum for homogeneous groups. In Emerging Practices in Mathematics Education, Twenty-second Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Washington, D. C.: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1954. Pp. 27– 33. 12Beckmann, M. W. How mathematically literate is the typical ninth grader after having completed either general mathematics or algebra? Sch. Sci. Math., June 1952, 52, 449– 455. 13Benz, H. E. A summary of some scientific investigations of the teaching of high school mathematics. In The Teaching of Mathematics in the Secondary School, Eighth Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, Bureau of Publications, 1933. Pp. 14– 55. 14Berger, M. L. Provisions for meeting the needs of poorly prepared students in algebra. Math. Tchr., March 1950, 43, 107– 111. 15Blair, G. M. Remedial arithmetic in senior high school. Math. Tchr., 1943, 36, 346– 350. 16Bloom, B. S., and Broder, L. J. Problem Solving Processes of College Students. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1950. 17Boyd, E. N. Diagnostic Study of Students' Difficulties in First-year College Mathematics. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, Contributions to Education, No. 798, 1940. Pp. 152. 18Boyer, L. E. Preparation of elementary arithmetic teachers. In Emerging Practices in Mathematics Education, Twenty-second Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Washington, D. C.: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1954. Pp. 172– 180. 19Brookover, W. B. Person-person interaction between teachers and pupils and teaching effectiveness. J. educ. Res., December 1940, 34, 272– 287. 20Brown, K. E. Mathematics in Public High Schools. Bulletin 1953, No. 5. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education, 1953. 21Brown, K. E. Inservice education for teachers of mathematics, institutes—workshops–conferences. In Emerging Practices in Mathematics Education, Twenty-second Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Washington, D. C.: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1954. Pp. 238– 243. 22Brown, K. E. Mathematics Education Research Studies–1953. Circular No. 377-II. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education, May 1954. 23Brown, K. E. Curriculum Materials in High-school Mathematics. Bulletin 1954, No. 9. Washington, D. C.: U. S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education, 1954. 24Brownell, W. A. The development of children's number ideas in the primary grades. Suppl. Educ. Monogr., No. 35. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1928. 25Brownell, W. A. Psychological considerations in the learning and teaching of arithmetic. In The Teaching of Arithmetic, Tenth Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, Bureau of Publications, 1935. Pp. 1– 32. 26Brownell, W. A., and Chazal, C. B. The effects of premature drill in third grade arithmetic. J. educ. Res., September 1935, 29, 17– 28. 27Brownell, W. A. Readiness and the arithmetic curriculum. Elem. Sch. J., 1938, 38, 495– 508. 28Brownell, W. A. Two kinds of learning in arithmetic. J. educ. Res., May 1938, 21, 656– 664. 29Brownell, W. A. Learning as reorganization. Duke University Research Studies in Education, No. 3. Durham, N. C.: Duke University Press, 1939. 30Brownell, W. A. Borrowing in subtraction. J. educ. Res., February 1940, 33, 415– 424. 31Brownell, W. A., and others. Arithmetic in grades I and II. Duke University Research Studies in Education, No. 6. Durham, N. C.: Duke University Press, 1941. Pp. 175. 32Brownell, W. A. A study of learning in one phase of arithmetic. J. gen. Psychol., 1941, 24, 457– 465. 33Brownell, W. A., and Carper, D. V. Learning the Multiplication Combinations. Durham, N. C.: Duke University Press, 1943. 34Brownell, W. A. When is arithmetic meaningful? J. educ. Res., March 1945, 38, 481– 498. 35Brownell, W. A. Meaning theory in arithmetic. Instructor, September 1945, 54, 31. 36Brownell, W. A. The place of meaning in the teaching of arithmetic. Elem. Sch. J., January 1947, 47, 257– 258. 37Brownell, W. A., and Moser, H. E. Meaningful versus mechanical learning: A study in grade III subtraction. Duke University Research Studies in Education, No. 8. Durham, N. C.: Duke University Press, 1949. 38Brownell, W. A. Arithmetic readiness as a practical classroom concept. Elem. Sch. J., September 1951, 52, 15– 22. 39Brueckner, L. J. The development of ability in arithmetic. In Child Development and the Curriculum, Thirty-eighth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1939. Pp. 275– 298. 40Brueckner, L. J. The development of readiness tests in arithmetic. J. educ. Res., September 1940, 34, 14– 20. 41Bryan, R. C. Evaluation of student reactions to teaching procedures. Educ. Dig., December 1945, 9, 55– 56. 42Buckingham, B. R. Elementary Arithmetic, Its Meaning and Practice. Boston: Ginn, 1947. 43Buckingham, B. R. Significance, meaning, insight—these three. Math. Tchr., January 1938, 31, 24– 30. 44Buckingham, B. R., and MacLatchy, J. The number abilities of children when they enter grade one. In Report of the Society's Committee on Arithmetic, Twenty-ninth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Bloomington, Ill.: Public School Publishing Company, 1930. Pp. 473– 524. 45Burgess, E. Personality factors in over- and under-achievers in engineering. In Penn State University Abstracts of Dissertations, 1953–1955, 1955, 16, 536– 543. 46Burt, C. L.C.C. reports on backwardness in special subjects (II: Arithmetic). Unpublished, 1928. 47Buswell, G. T., and John, L. The vocabulary of arithmetic. Suppl. Educ. Monogr., No. 38. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1931. 48Buswell, G. T. Methods of studying pupils' thinking in arithmetic. In Arithmetic 1949. Suppl. Educ. Monogr., No. 70. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1949. Pp. 55– 63. 49Buswell, G. T. Introduction (Chapter I). In The Teaching of Arithmetic, Fiftieth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education, 1951. Pp. 1– 5. 50Buswell, G. T. The psychology of learning in relation to the teaching of arithmetic. In The Teaching of Arithmetic, Fiftieth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education, 1951. Pp. 143– 154. 51Buswell, G. T. Needed research in arithmetic. In The Teaching of Arithmetic, Fiftieth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education, 1951. Pp. 282– 297. 52Butler, C. H., and Wren, F. L. The Teaching of Secondary Mathematics. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1941. 53Butsch, R. L. C. Teacher rating. Rev. educ. Res., 1931, 1, 99–107 and 149–152. 54Carlton, C. An emerging mathematics curriculum. In Emerging Practices in Mathematics Education, Twenty-second Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Washington, D. C.: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1954. Pp. 2– 9. 55Carpenter, D. The development of a differentiated mathematics curriculum. In Emerging Practices in Mathematics Education, Twenty-second Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Washington, D. C.: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1954. Pp. 15– 23. 56Castator, R. Geometry developed through pupil-teacher planning. In Emerging Practices in Mathematics Education, Twenty-second Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Washington, D. C.: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1954. Pp. 64– 72. 57Cattell, R. B. Personality traits associated with abilities: With verbal and math abilities. J. educ. Psychol., 1945, 36, 475– 486. 58Committee on Learning and Instruction of the National Society for Study of Education. Learning and Instruction. Forty-ninth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1950. 59 Committee on Mathematical Training of Social Scientists. Recommended policies for the mathematical training of social scientists. Items (Social Science Research Council), June 1955, 9, 13– 16. 60Committee on the Teaching of Arithmetic of the National Society for the Study of Education. The Teaching of Arithmetic. Fiftieth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education, 1951. 61Commission on Post-War Plans of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Second report of the Commission on Post-War Plans. Math. Tchr., May 1945, 38, 195– 221. 62 Commission on Secondary School Curriculum of the Progressive Education Association. Mathematics in General Education. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1940. 63Cook, W. W., and Leeds, C. H. Measuring the teacher personality. Educ. psychol. Measmt, May 1947, 7, 399– 410. 64 Critical Years Ahead in Science Teaching. Report of Conference on Nation-wide Problems of Science Teaching in the Secondary Schools held at Harvard University, Cambridge, Mass., July 15 to August 12, 1953. Andover, Mass.: E. C. Weaver, Phillips Academy. 65Cronbach, L. J. Educational Psychology. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1954. 66Cronbach, L. J. Text Materials in Modern Education. Urbana, Ill.: University, of Illinois Press, 1955. 67Davis, R. B. Emotion and thought. Math. Tchr., March 1955, 48, 133– 145. 68Dawson, D. T., and Ruddell, A. K. Case for the meaning, theory in teaching arithmetic. Elem. Sch. J., March 1955, 55, 393– 399. 69Dewey, J. Psychology of Number and Its Application to the Teaching of Arithmetic. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1895. 70Dickey, J. W. Arithmetic and Gestalt psychology. Elem. Sch. J., 1939, 39, 46– 53. 71Dodes, I. A. The science of teaching mathematics. Math. Tchr., March 1953, 46, 157– 166. 72Domas, S., and Tiedeman, D. V. Teacher competence: An annotated bibliography. J. exp. Educ., December 1950, 19, 101– 218. 73Douglass, H. R. The development of number concepts in children of pre-school and kindergarten age. J. exp. Psychol., December 1925, 8, 455. 74Drummond, M. Learning Arithmetic by the Montessori Method. London: George Harol, 1917. 75Duncker, K. On problem solving. Psychol. Monogr., 1945, 58, No. 5. 76Dunn, W. H. The influence of the teacher factor in predicting success in ninth grade algebra. J. educ. Res., April 1937, 30, 577– 582. 77Dutton, W. H. Attitudes of prospective teachers toward arithmetic. Elem. Sch. J., October 1951, 52, 84– 90. 78Erickson, H. E. A factorial study of teaching ability. J. exp. Educ., September 1954, 23, 1– 39. 79Fawcett, H. P. The Nature of Proof. Thirteenth Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Washington, D. C.: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1938. 80Fehr, H. F. Present research in the teaching of arithmetic, Tchrs. Coll. Rec., October 1950, 52, 11– 23. 81Fernald, G. M. Remedial Techniques in Basic School Subjects. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1943. 82Fischer, C. L. Characteristics of high school pupils having difficulty in mathematics. Unpublished master's dissertation, University of Chicago, 1935. 83Gager, W. A. Concepts for certain functional mathematics courses. Sch. Sci. Math., October 1950, 50, 533– 539. 84Geiselmann, H. A. Mathematical deficiencies of College of Agriculture freshmen at Cornell University. Roads Ahead in Secondary Education. Proceedings of the 70th Annual Meeting of the New York State Association of Secondary School Principals, December 1954. 85 General Education in School and College. A Committee Report by Members of the Faculties of Andover, Exeter, Lawrenceville, Harvard, Princeton, and Yale. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1952. 86Glenn, W. H. Curriculum development to capitalize on the interrelationships of the many areas of mathematics. In Emerging Practices in Mathematics Education, Twenty-second Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Washington, D. C.: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics; 1954. Pp. 9– 15. 87Glennon, V. J. A study in needed redirection in the preparation of teachers of arithmetic. Math. Tchr., December 1949, 42, 389– 396. 88Glennon, V. J. Action research changes the teaching of arithmetic in central New York State. Educ. Ldrship, May 1950, 7, 583– 584. 89Gotham, R. E. Personality and teaching efficiency. J. exp. Educ., December 1945, 14, 157– 165. 90Grant, A. An analysis of the number knowledge of first-grade pupils according to levels of intelligence. J. exp. Educ., September 1938, 7, 63– 66. 91Grossnickle, F. E. The training of teachers of arithmetic. In The Teaching of Arithmetic, Fiftieth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education, 1951. Pp. 203– 231. 92Grossnickle, F. E. Kinds of errors in division of decimals and their constancy. J. educ. Res., October 1943, 37, 110– 117. 93Grossnickle, F. E. How to find the position of the decimal point in the quotient. Elem. Sch. J., April 1952, 52, 452– 457. 94Guiler, W. A. Difficulties encountered by college freshmen in decimals. J. educ. Res., September 1946, 40, 1– 13. 95Gunderson, A. G. Number concepts held by seven year olds. Math. Tchr., January 1940, 33, 18– 24. 96Hadamard, J. The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 1945. 97Habel, E. A. Deficiencies of college freshmen in arithmetic: Diagnosis and remedy. Sch. Sci. Math., June 1950, 50, 480– 484. 98Hanza, M. Retardation in mathematics amongst grammar school pupils. Brit. J. educ. Psychol., 1952, 22, 189– 195. 99Harap, H., and Mapes, C. E. The learning of fundamentals in an arithmetic activity program. Elem. Sch. J., March 1934, 34, 515– 525. 100Harding, L. W., and Bryan, I. P. An experimental comparison of drill and direct experience in arithmetic learning in a fourth grade. J. educ. Res., January 1944, 37, 321– 337. 101Hartung, M. L. Modern methods and current criticisms of mathematical education. Sch. Sci. Math., February 1955, 55, 85– 90. 102Havighurst, R. J. Can mathematicians and educationists cooperate? Math. Tchr., May 1937, 30, 211– 213. 103Hawley, H. R. Relational and Functional Thinking in Mathematics. Ninth Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, Bureau of Publications, 1935. 104Hearn, A. C. Case studies of unsuccessful teachers. Educ. Admin. Superv., March 1952, 38, 171– 174. 105Hightower, H. W. Effect of instructional procedures on achievement in fundamental operations in arithmetic. Educ. Admin. Superv., October 1954, 40, 336– 348. 106Hildreth, G. Learning the 3 R's. Minneapolis, Minn.: Educational Publishers, 1936. 107Hilgard, E. R. Theories of Learning. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1948. 108Hoel, L. An experiment in clinical procedures for arithmetic. In Emerging Practices in Mathematics Education, Twenty-second Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Washington, D. C.: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1954. Pp. 222– 232. 109Horn, E. Arithmetic in the elementary school curriculum. In The Teaching of Arithmetic, Fiftieth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education, 1951. Pp. 6– 21. 110Houston, L. Articulating junior high mathematics with elementary arithmetic. Sch. Sci. Math., February 1951, 51, 117– 121. 111Howard, C. F. Three methods of teaching arithmetic. Calif. J. educ. Res., January 1950, 1, 25– 29. 112Humphreys, L. G. Transfer of training in general education. J. gen. Educ., April 1951, 5, 210– 216. 113Irvin, L. The organization of instruction in arithmetic and basic mathematics in selected secondary schools. Math. Tchr., April 1955, 46, 236. 114Joint Commission of the Mathematical Association of America, Inc., and the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. In The Place of Mathematics in Secondary Education, Fifteenth Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, Bureau of Publications, 1940. 115Jones, P. S., Beckett, K. E., Price, H. V., and Terhune, V. A report on progress in mathematical education. Sch. Sci. Math., June 1949, 49, 465– 474. 116Judd, C. H. Psychological analysis of the fundamentals of arithmetic. Suppl. Educ. Monogr., No. 32. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1927. 117Karon, B. P. The personality factors which may be involved in the development of mathematical ability. Princeton, N. J.: Educational Testing Service Research Memorandum 55-6, 1955. (Unpublished report.). 118Katona, G. Organizing and Memorizing. New York: Columbia University Press, 1939. 119Katona, G. The role of the order of presentation in learning. Amer. J. Psychol., 1942, 55, 328– 353. 120Keats, J. A. Formal and concrete thought processes. Princeton, K. J.: Educational Testing Service Research Bulletin 55-17, 1955. (Ph.D. thesis; multilithed report.). 121Kinney, L. B., Eagle, E., and Purdy, C. The teaching of mathematics in high Bchool and college. Rev. educ. Res., October 1951, 21, 305– 316. 122Kinsella, J. J. Some reflections on the general mathematics situation. Sch. Sci. Math., June 1954, 54, 431– 438. 123Kinzer, J., and Kinzer, L. College chemistry students deficient in arithmetic academic data. Educ. Res. Bull., January 1948, 27, 8– 10. 124Kinzer, J., and Kinzer, L. Some bases for predicting of marks in advanced engineering mathematics. Educ. Res. Bull., January 1954, 33, 13– 18. 125Koenker, R. H. Arithmetic readiness at the kindergarten level. J. educ. Res., November 1948, 42, 218– 223. 126Lamke, T. A. Personality and teaching success. J. exp. Educ., December 1951, 20, 217– 257. 127Langer, R. E. The things I should have done, I did not do. Amer. Math. Mon., August-September 1952, 59, 443– 448. 128Layton, W. I. The certification of teachers of mathematics. Math. Tchr., December 1949, 42, 377– 380. 129Layton, W. I. An analysis of certification requirements for teachers of mathematics. Contribution to Education, No. 402. Nashville, Tenn.: George Peabody College for Teachers, 1949. Pp. 215. 130Learned, W. S. Tested achievement of prospective teachers in Pennsylvania. In Thirty-first Annual Report of the President of the Foundation, The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching. Boston: Merrymount Press, 1936. Pp. 29– 51. 131Lecky, P. Self Consistency, a Theory of Personality. New York: Island Press, 1945. 132Lentz, D. W. The high schocl principal looks at the mathematics program. Bull. Natl. Assoc. Second. Sch. Prin., May 1954, 38, 40– 47. 133Lewis, H. An experiment in developing critical thinking through the teaching of plane demonstrative geometry. Math. Tchr., December 1950, 43, 411– 413. 134Long, L., and Welch, L. The development of the ability to discriminate and match numbers. J. genet. Psychol., December 1941, 59, 377– 387. 135MacDuffee, C. C. Teacher education in algebra. Amer. Math. Mon., June-July 1953, 60, 367– 375. 136MacLane, S. The impact of modern mathematics. Bull. Natl. Assoc. Second. Sch. Prin., May 1954, 38, 66– 70. 137McConnell, T. R. Recent trends in learning theory and their application to the psychology of arithmetic. In Arithmetic in General Education, Sixteenth Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, Bureau of Publications, 1944. Pp. 143– 154. 138Mallory, V. S. Providing for individual needs in mathematics. Math. Tchr., May 1937, 30, 214– 220. 139Maul, R. C. Changing nature of our teacher supply. Sch. and Soc., October 1954, 80, 97– 99. 140Maul, R. C. What becomes of teacher candidates? Sch. Exec., November 1954, 74, 46– 48. 141Maul, R. C. Teacher supply and demand. J. tchr. Educ., March 1954, 5, 3– 52. 142Mayer, J. Mathematical ideas. Sch. Sci. Math., January 1955, 55, 5– 13. 143Mayor, J. R. A suggestive course of study in mathematics. Bull. Natl. Assoc. Second. Sch. Prin., May 1954, 38, 80– 87. 144Michael, R. E. The relative effectiveness of two methods of teaching certain topics in ninth grade algebra. Math. Tchr., February 1949, 42, 83– 87. 145Montessori, M. The Advanced Montessori Method, Scientific Pedagogy as Applied to Children from Seven to Eleven Years. II. The Montessori Elementary Material. Tr. from the Italian by Arthur Livingston. New York: Stokes, 1917. 146Montross, H. W. Temperament and teaching success. J. exp. Educ., September 1954, 23, 73– 97. 147Morton, R. L. Teaching Arithmetic in the Elementary School. ( Vol. II.) New York: Silver Burdett, 1938. Pp. 178– 316. 148Morton, R. L. Teaching Arithmetic. What Research Says to the Teacher. No. 2. Washington, D. C.: National Education Association, October 1953. 149Mott, S. M. Number concepts of small children. Math. Tchr., November 1945, 38, 291– 301. 150Mueller, F., and Moser, H. Background mathematics for teachers of arithmetic. In Emerging Practices in Mathematics Education, Twenty-second Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Washington, D. C.: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1954. Pp. 180– 188. 151Murphy, C. D. An attempt at solving the problem of individual differences. Math. Tchr., January 1936, 29, 32– 38. 152 National Committee on Mathematical Requirements, The Mathematical Association of America, Inc. The Reorganization of Mathematics in Secondary Education. New York: Houghton-Mifflin, 1923. 153Newsom, C. V. Mathematical background needed by teachers of arithmetic. In The Teaching of Arithmetic, Fiftieth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education, 1951. Pp. 232– 250. 154Newsom, C. V. Some educational problems of significance to engineering colleges. Math. Tchr., April 1955, 48, 194– 197, and 202. 155Northrop, E. P. Mathematics in a liberal education. Amer. Math. Mon., March 1945, 52, 132– 137. 156Northrop, E. P. The mathematics program in the College of the University of Chicago. Amer. Math. Mon., January 1948, 55, 1– 7. 157Oeser, O. A., and Emery, F. E. Social Structure and Personality in a Rural Community. London: Routledge, Kegan, Paul, 1954. 158O'Halloran, A. An investigation of personality factors associated with underachievement in arithmetic and reading. Unpublished master's thesis, Purdue University Library, August 1954. 159Ohlsen, M. M. Control of fundamental mathematical skills and concepts by high school students. Math. Tchr., December 1946, 39, 365– 371. 160Ojemann, R. H., and Wilkinson, F. R. The effect on pupil growth of an increase in teachers understanding of pupil behavior. J. exp. Educ., October 1939, 8, 143– 147. 161Olson, W. C. Child Development. Boston: Heath, 1949. 162Orleans, J. S. The Understanding of Arithmetic Processes and Concepts Possessed by Teachers of Arithmetic. New York: Office of Research and Evaluation, Division of Teacher Education, College of the City of New York, Publication No. 12, 1952. 163Orleans, J. S., and Sperling, J. L. Arithmetic knowledge of graduate students. J. educ. Res., November 1954, 48, 177– 186. 164Phillips, C. Background and mathematical achievement of elementary education students in arithmetic for teachers. Sch. Sci. Math., January 1953, 53, 48– 52. 165Piaget, J. Logic and Psychology. Manchester, Eng.: Manchester University Press, 1953. 166Piaget, J. The Psychology of Intelligence. New York: Harcourt, Brace, 1950. 167Piaget, J., and Szeminska. The Child's Conception of Number. Paris: Delerchaux and Nestle, 1941. 168Plank, E. N. Observations on attitudes of young children toward mathematics. Math. Tchr., October 1950, 43, 252– 263. 169Plank, E. N., and Plank, R. Emotional components in arithmetical learning as seen through autobiographies. In The Psychoanalytic Study of the Child. Vol. IX. New York: International Universities Press, 1954. Pp. 274– 293. 170Polya, G. Patterns of Plausible Inference. Vol. II. Mathematics and Plausible Reasoning. Princeton, N. J.: Princeton University Press, 1954. 171Potter, M. A. Corralling the wandering decimal point. Math. Tchr., February 1947, 40, 51– 57. 172Prescott, D. A. Emotion and the Educative Process. Washington, D. C.: American Council on Education, 1938. 173Pressey, S. L. Educational Acceleration. Appraisals and Basic Problems. Columbus, O.: Ohio State University Press, 1949. 174Pule, W. H. The relation between intelligence and teacher success. Educ. Admin. Superv., April 1928, 14, 257– 267. 175 W. D. Reeve, (Ed.) The Place of Mathematics in Modern Education. Eleventh Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, Bureau of Publications, 1936. 176Reeve, W. D. Modern curriculum problems in the teaching of mathematics in secondary schools. Math. Tchr., March 1939, 32, 118ff. 177 Report of the Committee of Ten on Secondary School Subjects. New York: American Book Co., 1894. 178 Report of the EMC-SMC Joint Committee on High School Teachers of Science. New York: Engineering Manpower Commission, 29 West 39th Street, 1955. 179Retan, G. A. Emotional instability and teaching success. J. educ. Res., October 1943, 37, 135– 141. 180Rhoads, M. V. The training of elementary school arithmetic teachers. Ed.D. project report. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, 1950. (Typewritten.). 181Ringness, T. A. Relationships between certain attitudes towards teaching and teaching success. J. exp. Educ., September 1952, 21, 1– 56. 182Rochlin, I. Nonintellectual factors in the learning of general mathematics. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Chicago, 1952. 183Rosander, A. C. Quantitative thinking on the secondary school level. Math. Tchr., February 1936, 29, 57– 60. 184Rosenquist, L. L. Young Children Learn to Use Arithmetic. Boston: Ginn, 1949. 185Rostker, L. E. The measurement of teaching ability. Study No. 1. J. exp. Educ., 1945, 14, 6– 51. 186Russell, N. M. Arithmetical concepts of children. J. educ. Res., May 1936, 29, 647– 663. 187Ryans, D. G. The criteria of teaching effectiveness. J. educ. Res., May 1949, 42, 690– 699. 188Sanford, C. W. High school science and mathematics, for whom and what? Sch. Sci. Math., April 1950, 50, 307– 319. 189Seagoe, M. V. Standardized tests in the pretraining selection of teachers. J. educ. Res., May 1943, 36, 678– 693. 190Schorling, R. The Teaching of Mathematics. Ann Arbor, Mich.: Ann Arbor Press, 1936. 191Schunert, J. The association of mathematical achievement with certain factors resident in the teacher, in the teaching, in the pupil, and in the school. J. exp. Educ., March 1951, 19, 219– 238. 192Sherer, L. Some implications from research in arithmetic. Childhood Educ., March 1953, 29, 320– 324. 193Skinner, B. F. The science of learning and the art of teaching. Harvard Educ. Rev., Spring 1954, 24, 86– 97. 194Smith, R. Meaningful division. Math. Tchr., January 1950, 53, 12– 18. 195Smith, R. Provisions for individual differences. In The Learning of Mathematics, Its Theory and Practice., Twenty-first Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. Washington, D. C.: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1953. Pp. 271– 302. 196Spitzer, H. F. The abacus in the teaching of arithmetic. Elem. Sch. J., 1942, 42, 448– 451. 197Spitzer, H. F. Techniques for evaluating outcomes of instruction in arithmetic. Elem. Sch. J., September 1948, 49, 21– 31. 198Spitzer, H. F. Learning and teaching arithmetic. In The Teaching of Arithmetic, Fiftieth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education, 1951. Pp. 120– 142. 199Stern, C. Children Discover Arithmetic. New York: Harper, 1949. 200Stokes, C. N. Teaching the Meanings of Arithmetic. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1951. 201Sueltz, B. A. Mathematical understandings and judgments retained by college freshmen. Math. Tchr., January 1951, 44, 13– 19. 202Swenson, E. J. Organization and generalization as factors in learning, transfer, and retroactive inhibition. In Learning Theory in School Situations, University of Minnesota Studies in Education, No. 2. Minneapolis, Minn.: University of Minnesota Press, 1949. Pp. 9– 39. 203Swenson, E. J. Arithmetic for preschool and primary-grade children. In The Teaching of Arithmetic, Fiftieth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education, 1951. Pp. 53– 75. 204Taylor, H. The influence of the teacher on relative class standing. In Nature and Nurture, Twenty-seventh Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Bloomington, Ill.: Public School Publishing Company, 1928. Pp. 97– 100. 205Terman, L. M., and Oden, M. H. The Gifted Child Grows Up. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press, 1947. 206Thacker, G. R., and Read, C. B. Courses desirable for training teachers of high school mathematics. Sch. Sci. Math., November 1950, 49, 611– 619. 207 The Kenyon Plan. School and College Study of Admission with Advanced Standing. Report of Sub-Committee of Mathematics. Swarthmore, Penna.: H. Brinkmann, Swarthmore College, 1953. (Mimeographed report.). 208 The 1954 Teacher Supply and Demand Report–reprinted from J. tchr. Educ., March 1954. Washington, D. C.: National Education Association. 209Thiele, C. L. The Contribution of Generalization to the Learning of the Addition Facts. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, Bureau of Publications, 1938. 210Thiele, C. L. Arithmetic in the middle grades. In The Teaching of Arithmetic, Fiftieth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education, 1951. Pp. 76– 102. 211Thorndike, E. L. New Methods in Teaching Arithmetic. New York: Rand-McNally, 1921. 212Thorndike, E. L. Psychology of Arithmetic. New York: Macmillan, 1922. 213Thorndike, E. L. The Psychology of Algebra. New York: Macmillan, 1923. 214Thrum, M. E. The development of concepts of magnitude. Child Developmt, 1935, 6, 120– 140. 215Truscott, G., Jenkins, D. T., and Korb, G. Who teaches algebra to whom? Math. Tchr., April 1955, 48, 257– 260. 216Turner, I. S. The Training of Mathematics Teachers. Fourteenth Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, Bureau of Publications, 1939. 217 Twenty-first Yearbook of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. The Learning of Mathematics, Its Theory and Practice. Washington, D. C.: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 1953. 218Ulmer, G. Teaching geometry to cultivate reflective thinking: An experimental study with 1239 high school pupils. J. exp. Educ., September 1939, 8, 18– 25. 219 UNESCO. The Education and Training of Teachers toward World Understanding. New York: UNESCO. (A pamphlet.). 220 University of Illinois. Mathematical needs of prospective students at the College of Engineering of the University of Illinois. University of Illinois Bulletin, No. 9, Vol. 49, September 1951. 221Van Engen, H. Some more thoughts on placing the decimal point in quotients. Math. Tchr., October 1945, 38, 243– 245. 222Van Engen, H. An analysis of meaning in arithmetic. Elem. Sch. J., February and March 1949, 49, 321–329 and 395–400. 223The School and College Study of Admission with Advanced Standing. Reports of Committees, 1952–1953. Philadelphia, Penna.: Office of the Executive Director, Central High School, 1953. Pp. 106– 130. 224Washburne, C. W. When should we teach arithmetic? Elem. Sch. J., May 1928, 27, 659– 665. 225Washburne, C. W. The work of the Committee of Seven on grade placement in arithmetic. In Child Development and the Curriculum, Thirty-eighth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part I. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1939. Pp. 299– 324. 226Washburne, C. W. A reply to Brownell's critique of the Committee of Seven's experiments. Elem. Sch. J., 1939, 39, 417– 431. 227Washburne, C. W. Mental age and the arithmetic curriculum: A survey of the Committee of Seven grade placement investigations to date. J. educ. Res., March 1931, 23, 210– 231. 228Washburn, M. F. Mathematical ability, reasoning, and academic standing. Amer. J. Psychol., 1937, 50, 484– 488. 229Weaver, J. F. Misconceptions about rationalization in arithmetic. Math. Tchr., October 1951, 44, 377– 381. 230Weaver, J. F. Some areas of misunderstanding about meaning in arithmetic. Elem. Sch. J., September 1950, 51, 35– 41. 231Weiss, E. S. A factor analysis of mathematical ability. Unpublished Ed.D. thesis, Harvard Graduate School of Education, Cambridge, Mass. 232Wertheimer, M. Productive Thinking. New York: Harper, 1945. 233Wheat, H. G. The Psychology and Teaching of Arithmetic. Boston: Heath, 1937. 234Wheat, H. G. Studies in Arithmetic. Morgantown, W. Va.: West Virginia University, 1945. 235Wheat, H. G. How to Teach Arithmetic. Evanston, Ill.: Row, Peterson, 1951. 236Wheat, H. G. The nature and sequence of learning activities in arithmetic. In The Teaching of Arithmetic, Fiftieth Yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Chicago: National Society for the Study of Education, 1951. Pp. 22– 39. 237Whitehead, A. N. The Aims of Education and Other Essays. New York: Macmillan, 1929. 238Williams, C. M. Arithmetic learning in an experience curriculum. Educ. Res. Bull., September 1949, 28, 154– 168. 239Williams, W. L. What the colleges are doing about the poorly prepared student. Amer. Math. Mon., February 1954, 61, 86– 88. 240Willett, H. I. Staff Relations in School Administration. Thirty-third Yearbook of the American Association of School Administrators. Washington, D. C.: National Education Association, 1955. 241Wilson, J. D. Trends in elementary and secondary school mathematics, 1918–1948. Unpublished doctor's thesis, Stanford University, 1949. 242Wilson, G. M. Toward perfect scores in arithmetic fundamentals; study in research. Arith. Tchr., December 1954, 1, 13– 17. 243Witty, P. A. Evaluation of studies of the characteristics of the effective teacher. In Improving Educational Research, Official Report of the American Educational Research Association. Washington, D. C. American Educational Research Association, 1948. Pp. 198– 204. 244Woody, C. The arithmetic background of young children. J. educ. Res., October 1931, 24, 188– 201. 245Woody, C. A general educator looks at arithmetic readiness. Math. Tchr., November 1937, 30, 314– 321. Volume1955, Issue2December 1955Pages i-165 ReferencesRelatedInformation

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call