Abstract
Public procurement plays a fundamental pillar as an instrument able to ensure a more efficient use of public resources. In the context of European Union, the Directive 2014/24/UE of the European Parliament and the Council, which takes care of public procurement, made notable changes in relation to the causes of exclusion of economic agents from participating in contracting procedures. In Brazil, New Public Procurement and Administrative Contracts Law, Law n. 14.133/2021, also promoted changes in relation to the sanctioning scope and the possibilities of rehabilitation of companies. In this way, the objetive of this article is, in the light of the principle of competition, analyze the limits of the restriction clauses required from the design of Self-Cleaning, as an institute of community law able to relativize the expulsion grounds set out in the Directive, relating them to the new Brazilian legislation. The comparison between the legislations shows that while Europe has an established and detailed system for self-cleaning, the Brazilian approach is still maturing and could benefit from European practices to strengthen public policies through mechanisms for the reintegration of economic operators. The conclusion is that the experience observed through the Directive can contribute to Brazil's public procurement system, optimizing transparency, competitiveness, and especially, integrity in public contracting processes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: A&C - Revista de Direito Administrativo & Constitucional
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.