Abstract
AbstractMetal extractability from soils may be affected by analytical errors, sample preparation, inaccurate sampling as well as by natural variation in space and time. During one year, we sampled the Ah horizons of a forested Luvi‐Calcaric Cambisol from 43 subplots in a visually homogeneous area of 0.5 ha six times to determine the spatial and seasonal variation of pH, OC, and Fe, Mn, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn extractable by 0.1 M BaCl2 and 0.05 M Na2ETDA. As indicated by a two‐way ANOVA, the spatial and seasonal variations of all parameters were significant at p < 0.01. The metal‐specific ranges of seasonal variation varied between 21% and 90% of the minima for Na2EDTA, and 15% and 71% for 0.1 M BaCl2. The error due to within‐subplot variability and inaccurate sampling, tested by sampling twice in April 1992, was small compared to the natural seasonal and spatial variation. The relative differences between the means of the two samplings tended to increase with the coefficients of spatial variation, suggesting an increasing contribution of within‐subplot variability to the sampling error. The study shows that both spatial and seasonal variation of extractable metal fractions may bias the analysis of mobile metal fractions in a rarely predictable way.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.