Abstract

The launch of a nationwide consultation in January 2021 by the UK Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) on the regulation of genetic technologies has been used as an opportunity by the UK Government to gauge public and scientific opinion on the applications of gene editing in agriculture and aquaculture. In particular, the consultation sought to consider the controversial question of whether gene editing (GE) should be subject to the same regulations as genetically modified organisms (GMOs). The distinction between GE and GMO products, as well as between the legal regulations governing them, are highly important: currently, the UK still follows the EU’s restrictive approach, whereby gene editing is regulated in the same way as GMOs. However, in light of the UK’s departure from the EU, the UK government seems willing to reconsider this approach and adopt a new regulatory framework characterised by less stringent controls. Accordingly, this review paper examines the current legal framework on gene editing and GMOs in the UK and EU, as well as in other relevant jurisdictions, before then examining the Defra consultation in light of the mixed responses to it from both the scientific community and the general public. The paper concludes with a number of considerations that should inform any proposed post-Brexit reform of the framework that allows for the correct balance to be struck between scientific development, food security, human health, and the environment. 

Highlights

  • Ανασκόπηση του ισχύοντος και του μετά Βrexit νομικού πλαισίου του Ηνωμένου Βασιλείου για τη ρύθμιση των γενετικών τεχνολογιών

  • The launch of a nationwide consultation in January 2021 by the UK Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) on the regulation of genetic technologies has been used as an opportunity by the UK Government to gauge public and scientific opinion on the applications of gene editing in agriculture and aquaculture

  • The distinction between GE and genetically modified organisms (GMOs) products, as well as between the legal regulations governing them, are highly important: currently, the UK still follows the EU’s restrictive approach, whereby gene editing is regulated in the same way as GMOs

Read more

Summary

Consultation on the Regulation of Genetic

In this light, Sir David Baulcombe, professor of botany in the Department of Plant Sciences at the University of Cambridge, pointed out that the overwhelming view of public sector scientists is that these Nobel prize winning methods for gene editing can lead to better availability of crops and livestock as part of a sustainable and profitable agricultural system.[104]. Sir David Baulcombe, professor of botany in the Department of Plant Sciences at the University of Cambridge, pointed out that the overwhelming view of public sector scientists is that these Nobel prize winning methods for gene editing can lead to better availability of crops and livestock as part of a sustainable and profitable agricultural system.[104] One such public sector scientists point to the potential for improvement of animal welfare following the lifting of restrictions on gene editing. Ανασκόπηση development of the UK’s future food and farming system

Agricultural Biotechnology Market to
Findings
ENSSER Statement on New Genetic
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call