Abstract

Retracted: Comparison of Two Entry Methods for Laparoscopic Port Entry: Technical Point of View

Highlights

  • Diagnostic and erapeutic Endoscopy has retracted the article titled “Comparison of Two Entry Methods for Laparoscopic Port Entry: Technical Point of View” [1]

  • In the article as a whole 942/4808 words are original (20%) and 80% of the article text is reproduced from 20 previously published articles by other authors, most but not all of which were cited. e main sources are as follows: (1) Afifi, Y., A

  • Evaluation of tests performed to confirm the position of the Veress needle for creation of pneumoperitoneum in selected patients: a prospective clinical trial

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Diagnostic and erapeutic Endoscopy has retracted the article titled “Comparison of Two Entry Methods for Laparoscopic Port Entry: Technical Point of View” [1]. In the article as a whole 942/4808 words are original (20%) and 80% of the article text is reproduced from 20 previously published articles by other authors, most but not all of which were cited. E main sources are as follows: (1) Afifi, Y., A.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.