Abstract

In light of the rapid population growth forecast for the coming years and the powerful transformations already occurring throughout its whole territory, today’s Switzerland stands in urgent need of critical reflection on its urban future. A novel set of concepts and actions is needed in order to produce new visions and operational tools capable of critically reconsidering mainstream debates about Switzerland’s future urban growth. On the one hand, national policies and narratives tend de facto towards lending increasing support to a dynamic of “metropolization,” which usually leads to stronger territorial hierarchization strategies and processes aiming at a spatial condensation of urban services and functions in specific, selected locations. On the other hand, however, the Swiss territory—with its deep rootedness in federalism and its unique aggregative structure—still embodies key features of what, at different times, has been named a single “Grande Ville,” a “dezentralisierte Großstadt,” a “Ville-Territoire” or, more recently, “Stadtland Schweiz.” The country as a whole is still characterized by extended and layered conditions of inhabitability, where the dispersion of the urban fabric, enmeshed within the agricultural and forested landscape, is articulated through horizontal rather that vertical relationships. This paper offers a novel reflection on how the ongoing metropolization process could be seen as a positive force if a markedly different idea of metropolitan space is introduced—the “Horizontal Metropolis.” Its key idea is to distribute and enlarge the benefits which metropolization, if conducted in line with the tradition of decentralization and horizontality, could bring to the Swiss territory and its population. The “Horizontal Metropolis” concept recovers and leverages the various forms of inhabitability and their relation with the infrastructural support. It considers the long-term construction of the Swiss “City-Territory” as a renewable resource, which means reflecting on new life cycles, capitalizing on the urban and territorial embodied energy, and therefore rethinking, without denying it, Switzerland’s extensive and diffused fixed capital. This could be a precious resource to accommodate future urban growth and reorient the form it takes, keeping at bay indiscriminate sprawl as well as its currently predominant ideological counterpart, indiscriminate densification and polarization.

Highlights

  • Diffused Urbanization, Risks and Opportunities...during the past decades, there were attempts to spell out what seemed new in European territories

  • A novel set of concepts and actions is needed in order to produce visions and operational tools capable of addressing future urban challenges, of overcoming paradoxes related to the current urban condition, and of critically reconsidering mainstream debates about Switzerland’s future urban growth

  • The case of the West of Lausanne is only one of the many urban conditions which can be rethought as part of the Swiss Horizontal Metropolis. These explorations show that we are in urgent need of an alternative set of concepts and actions to produce visions and operational tools to deal with future urban challenges—concepts and actions capable of overcoming the paradoxes and contradictions of the current urban condition and of critically reformulating and recasting mainstream debates around the future of urban growth

Read more

Summary

Introduction

During the past decades, there were attempts to spell out what seemed new in European territories. With open space and landscape replacing architecture as the structuring elements of contemporary urbanism (Bélanger, 2009; Berger; 2009; Waldheim, 2006, 2016), the phenomena of urban dispersion have become important occasions to construct a broader vision of the city, capable of going beyond the metropolitan scale and overcoming old binary contrapositions such as center/periphery or town/country With this shift, a twofold need arose: first, to recognize the limits of architecture’s ability to order the city and second, to learn from the complex self-regulating orders already present in the urban fabric (Allen, 1999; Berger, 2009; Cadenasso, Pickett, McGrath, & Marshall, 2013; Pickett, Cadenasso, & McGrath, 2013). It is to this end that we would like to advance the notion of “Horizontal Metropolis.”

The “Horizontal Metropolis”: A Research Hypothesis
The Case of Urban Switzerland
Switzerland’s Contemporary and Future Issues Related to Urbanization
Switzerland’s Legacy of “Decentralized Centralization”
The Emergence of “Metropolization”-Related Dynamics
The Possibility of a Counter-Image
Approaching a Case Study
Findings
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.