Abstract

Identifying sounds is critical for an animal to make appropriate behavioral responses to environmental stimuli, including vocalizations from conspecifics. Identification of vocalizations may be supported by neuronal selectivity in the auditory pathway. The first place in the ascending auditory pathway where neuronal selectivity to vocalizations has been found is in the inferior colliculus (IC), but very few brainstem nuclei have been evaluated. Here, we tested whether selectivity to vocalizations is present in the dorsal cochlear nucleus (DCN). We recorded extracellular neural responses in the DCN of mice and found that fusiform cells responded in a heterogeneous and selective manner to mouse ultrasonic vocalizations. Most fusiform cells responded to vocalizations that contained spectral energy at much higher frequencies than the characteristic frequencies of the cells. To understand this mismatch of stimulus properties and frequency tuning of the cells, we developed a dynamic, nonlinear model of the cochlea that simulates cochlear distortion products on the basilar membrane. We preprocessed the vocalization stimuli through this model and compared responses to these distorted vocalizations with responses to the original vocalizations. We found that fusiform cells in the DCN respond in a heterogeneous manner to vocalizations, and that these neurons can use distortion products as a mechanism for encoding ultrasonic vocalizations. In addition, the selective neuronal responses were dependent on the presence of inhibitory sidebands that modulated the response depending on the temporal structure of the distortion product. These findings suggest that important processing of complex sounds occurs at a very early stage of central auditory processing and is not strictly a function of the cortex.

Highlights

  • An important task of neuroscience is to understand the multiple processing stages of behaviorally important sensory stimuli

  • The selectivity index (SI) was calculated as SI = (Ct − Ce)/Ct where Ct was the number of vocalizations presented and Ce was the number of vocalizations that evoked a response, such that high index values indicated high selectivity

  • The reverberation stage is applied to the waveform of the vocalization and repeatedly adds the waveform to itself with a 1 ms delay, and each reverberation is reduced by an exponentially

Read more

Summary

Introduction

An important task of neuroscience is to understand the multiple processing stages of behaviorally important sensory stimuli. The encoding of complex sounds such as vocalizations has historically been considered a function of the auditory cortex as cortical neurons are selective for both spectral and temporal features of species-specific vocalizations (Wollberg and Newman, 1972; Glass and Wollberg, 1983; Wang et al, 1995; Wang and Kadia, 2001). These neurons often respond better to vocalizations than pure tones and/or their responses to vocalizations cannot be predicted by their responses to pure tones. Similar to responses in the cortex, the responses to vocalizations in the IC are not well predicted by excitatory receptive fields and there is heterogeneity in the way neurons with similar frequency tuning respond to the same suite of vocalizations (Klug et al, 2002; Holmstrom et al, 2010)

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call