Abstract
The council of State, in several occasions and under different arguments, has declared the State as responsible due to the damages that the victims of terrorist attacks have suffered according to the criteria of damage imputation that range from lack of service, the damage itself or the exceptional damage. But the criteria of damage that comes directly from the terrorist attack according to the High Court’s jurisprudence, has not always been unified especially when it is related to reparatory parameters, which, in principle only deal with material and moral damages, from a private law perspective. Eventually, the jurisprudence shows a tendency towards a more humanized criterion, oriented by the “integral reparation” parameters, which transcend the traditional guidelines of damage reparation. Keywords Terrorist Act, State Responsibility, Integral Reparation, Damages.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.