Abstract

There has been little rigorous investigation of the transferability of existing empirical water clarity models developed at one location or time to other lakes and dates of imagery with differing conditions. Machine learning methods have not been widely adopted for analysis of lake optical properties such as water clarity, despite their successful use in many other applications of environmental remote sensing. This study compares model performance for a random forest (RF) machine learning algorithm and a simple 4-band linear model with 13 previously published empirical non-machine learning algorithms. We use Landsat surface reflectance product data aligned with spatially and temporally co-located in situ Secchi depth observations from northeastern USA lakes over a 34-year period in this analysis. To evaluate the transferability of models across space and time, we compare model fit using the complete dataset (all images and samples) to a single-date approach, in which separate models are developed for each date of Landsat imagery with more than 75 field samples. On average, the single-date models for all algorithms had lower mean absolute errors (MAE) and root mean squared errors (RMSE) than the models fit to the complete dataset. The RF model had the highest pseudo-R2 for the single-date approach as well as the complete dataset, suggesting that an RF approach outperforms traditional linear regression-based algorithms when modeling lake water clarity using satellite imagery.

Highlights

  • IntroductionWater clarity influences lake ecosystem function [1,2] and modulates susceptibility to climate change [3]

  • Water clarity is both an indicator and an influencer of lakes’ function in the landscape.For example, water clarity influences lake ecosystem function [1,2] and modulates susceptibility to climate change [3]

  • The analyses reported here use in situ measurements from 397 lakes to investigate the potential for random forest modeling with regression to improve estimates of lake water clarity from satellite imagery and evaluate the transferability of both RF models and traditional regression-based models across space and time

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Water clarity influences lake ecosystem function [1,2] and modulates susceptibility to climate change [3]. Ice-out is followed by a period of low water transparency due to turbidity from spring snowmelt and destratification conditions as well as the spring phytoplankton bloom [23]. This period is followed by the spring “clear-water phase” as zooplankton populations increase and consume phytoplankton. Collections of in situ Secchi measurements over wide areas are labor-intensive and often logistically challenging, necessitating other methods to expand the temporal and spatial scope of water quality assessment

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.