Abstract

In recent years, reliability-based design (RBD) has gradually gained popularity in geotechnical engineering. Several RBD codes have been developed and implemented around the world that calibrate ultimate limit state (ULS) designs for a target ULS reliability index (β(subscript uls)). However, the serviceability limit state (SLS) design still is considered using conventional deterministic approaches with an unknown SLS reliability index (β(subscript sls)). This paper makes use of a relationship between β(subscript sls) and β(subscript uls) to infer the β(subscript sls) of drilled shafts under undrained compression from the β(subscript uls) that is specified already in the design codes. The values of β(subscript sls) are estimated for drilled shafts designed in accordance with three different design methods (i.e., semi-empirical analysis using in situ and laboratory test data, analysis using static loading test results, and analysis using dynamic monitoring results) of the National Building Code of Canada (NBCC). The results indicate that, for the undrained compression capacity of drilled shafts designed in accordance with the NBCC, the designs automatically fulfill the corresponding SLS design requirements.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.