Abstract
Six conventional NDT techniques were tested in the laboratory using butt weld configured specimens having intentionally embedded cracks. Those NDT methods were 1) visual inspection, 2) magnetic particle testing, 3) dye penetrant testing, 4) fluorescent enhanced surface testing, 5) eddy current testing, and 6) ultrasonic testing. The other NDT methods provided better crack detection capabilities than visual inspection. Visual inspections by different personnel produced low detection rates. Tests using the fluorescent magnetic particle method missed several indications because of marginal test conditions. The other NDT methods detected all cracks. Laboratory tests revealed that the visually enhanced NDT methods could play useful roles in bridge inspection. Magnetic particle and dye penetrant testing were slow, but they would be beneficial for spot bridge inspections. Eddy current testing was found to be the fastest NDT method and would be best for large scale bridge inspections. Ultrasonic testing was useful for sizing. Modern digital ultrasonic flaw detectors offer advantages in calibration and data recording that make them more advantageous than conventional units for large scale bridge tests. A stand alone, microcomputer based data acquisition and data processing system was designed and assembled to assist highway personnel in planning and prioritizing bridge inspections. It may be used to acquire live load strain gage readings from selected bridge members and to store the data in digital form. The data may be processed by seven sequential computer programs to yield 1) digitized stresses, 2) stress range cycle histograms, 3) minor equivalent stress ranges, 4) root mean square equivalent stress ranges, 5) weighted equivalent stress ranges from several tests, and 6) predictions of fatigue lives of structural members based on the AASHTO fatigue design curve for specific structural members. The system has been tested and is capable of providing crack initiation data useful for scheduling or prioritizing nondestructive inspections of bridges.
Paper version not known (Free)
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have