Abstract

This paper presents the study conducted on the comparison of the performance of the two popular active control algorithms viz. Linear Quadratic Regulator (LQR) and Pole Placement technique in terms of their capability to alleviate the response of a structure to an earthquake. To compare the performance of the two control algorithms, a ten story regular shear building frame with three active tendons located in 1st, 4th and 5th Storys and subjected to an El Centro earthquake has been considered. A comparison of the numerical results shows that the reductions of maximum top floor displacement, maximum story drift and base shear obtained using LQR control algorithm are 71.48%, 59.70% and 62.7% while the reductions obtained using Pole Placement technique are 73.77%, 73.14% and 77% respectively. The percentage reduction of the three performance parameters per unit control force obtained using the two methods have also been estimated and compared. Pole placement technique gives higher reduction while the LQR algorithm gives more reduction per unit control force.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call