Abstract
Land reclamation over the coast has four philosophically values, among others is that reclamation must observe prevailing regulations. An administrative lawsuit has been lodged into Jakarta Administrative Court against the Governor of Jakarta Decree No. 2485 of 2015 concerning License on K Island Reclamation. The problems arose over the case both legally, socially, and philosophically. This article will examine the Administrative Court consideration over the case, especially on the issues of the implication of Governor’s license, coastal region use in the perspective of sustainable development, and the implication of license towards the case pending before civil court. The research methodology uses normative research. The research fi nds that the license issued by the Jakarta Governor comply with Article 93(1) of Law No. 32 of 2009 concerning Protection and Management of Living Environment. The use of coastal region should be directed for the achievement of sustainability of ecology, economy, social, and cultural. The implication of license related to civil case has a correlation that the licensee cannot freely doing reclamation even though he holds a license. The licensee must observe the impact of reclamation over surrounding environment. A civil lawsuit based on unlawful act committed by the licensee can be submitted if the reclamation infl icts fi nancial loss to the surrounding community.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
