Abstract
BackgroundEssentiality assays are important tools commonly utilized for the discovery of gene functions. Growth/no growth screens of single gene knockout strain collections are also often utilized to test the predictive power of genome-scale models. False positive predictions occur when computational analysis predicts a gene to be non-essential, however experimental screens deem the gene to be essential. One explanation for this inconsistency is that the model contains the wrong information, possibly an incorrectly annotated alternative pathway or isozyme reaction. Inconsistencies could also be attributed to experimental limitations, such as growth tests with arbitrary time cut-offs. The focus of this study was to resolve such inconsistencies to better understand isozyme activities and gene essentiality.ResultsIn this study, we explored the definition of conditional essentiality from a phenotypic and genomic perspective. Gene-deletion strains associated with false positive predictions of gene essentiality on defined minimal medium for Escherichia coli were targeted for extended growth tests followed by population sequencing and transcriptome analysis. Of the twenty false positive strains available and confirmed from the Keio single gene knock-out collection, 11 strains were shown to grow with longer incubation periods making these actual true positives. These strains grew reproducibly with a diverse range of growth phenotypes. The lag phase observed for these strains ranged from less than one day to more than 7 days. It was found that 9 out of 11 of the false positive strains that grew acquired mutations in at least one replicate experiment and the types of mutations ranged from SNPs and small indels associated with regulatory or metabolic elements to large regions of genome duplication. Comparison of the detected adaptive mutations, modeling predictions of alternate pathways and isozymes, and transcriptome analysis of KO strains suggested agreement for the observed growth phenotype for 6 out of the 9 cases where mutations were observed.ConclusionsLonger-term growth experiments followed by whole genome sequencing and transcriptome analysis can provide a better understanding of conditional gene essentiality and mechanisms of adaptation to such perturbations. Compensatory mutations are largely reproducible mechanisms and are in agreement with genome-scale modeling predictions to loss of function gene deletion events.
Highlights
Essentiality assays are important tools commonly utilized for the discovery of gene functions
The results presented demonstrate a striking agreement between model-predicted alternate isozymes/pathways and observed mutations and shed light on the dynamics of growth observed for various non-essential genes
Such discrepancies indicate areas for discovery or better understanding as they point out differences between in vivo screens and computations based on the collected wealth of knowledge for a given organism [9]. These discrepancies were previously identified as False positive (FP) model predictions
Summary
Essentiality assays are important tools commonly utilized for the discovery of gene functions. False positive predictions occur when computational analysis predicts a gene to be non-essential, experimental screens deem the gene to be essential. One explanation for this inconsistency is that the model contains the wrong information, possibly an incorrectly annotated alternative pathway or isozyme reaction. Defining the essential components of life in organisms large and small has been a topic of great scientific interest, and, on one extreme, there is a growing effort to understand the basic principles of life by studying and even synthesizing minimal organisms [1, 2]. Beyond understanding the basic genotype-phenotype connection of life, studies of gene essentiality provide knowledge for medical and industrial applications. Research studies of gene essentiality have become important knowledge sources for the advancement of science and medicine
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have