Abstract
This essay analyzes the hospitality-hostility dichotomy in International Refugee Law in light of Kantian philosophy. It argues that the 1951 Convention, while establishing hospitality as a principle, is often undermined by hostile State practices that prioritize national sovereignty. Through Kantian principles of hospitality and cosmopolitanism, the essay criticizes the reduction of the Convention's normative force, emphasizing the need to revive Kantian ideals to effectively protect and welcome refugees. It concludes that the Convention, despite being based on humanitarian principles, requires reformulation to address contemporary challenges and ensure the dignity and rights of refugees.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have