Abstract

In Taiwan, the rivers not only are fast-flowing with high discharge, but they badly erode their beds during the typhoon seasons. In addition, erosion on the concave bank in a meandering channel is the primary cause of levee break. Therefore, the study conducted a down-scale experiment on erosion induced by oblique flow in a laboratory. It was similar to number 27–34 cross sections of the Fengshan river of Hsinchu County, Taiwan. The region was chosen because there are some special attacking angles of water flow and historical precedents of levee break. The study adopted the discharges of return periods of 10 and 20 years and measured the flow field by laser doppler velocimetry (LDV). Then the protective effects with different spur types were examined. The results indicate that increasing velocity induces side erosion when the flow impacts with the adjacent angle on the concave bank. However, the decreasing of velocity causes deposition of sediment on the concave bank. Furthermore, based on the vertical velocity profile of water flow, a higher flow rate is measured in the downstream on the concave bank. After the spurs are installed, the velocity at the spurs in the downstream is reduced, and the cross section with the larger velocity is moved to upstream. In addition, after setting the spurs, the reduction rates in volume of scour are 7.97% of a 10 year return period and 4.65% of a 20 year return period, respectively. That demonstrates the scour is effectively reduced as long as the spurs are set. Although the erosion mitigation rate and protection effect are decreased when the velocity is high, there is still a good protection effect at the bank. The setting of spurs has the following effects: First, the maximum scour depth generates in the front spur, while the maximum scour position keeps away from the bank. Then, the overall flow rate can be reduced to approximately 35%–40% comparing with the original flow field. Lastly, the spur on the slope of 1/30 degrees demonstrated the best function of stretching the distance from the embankment.

Highlights

  • Due to the steep terrain and the heavy rainfall, the rivers in Taiwan are fast-flowing with high discharge

  • All the results showed there still were some distances between the maximum scour position and embankment which showed that the spur remained the function of protection on the river bank

  • With respect to the maximum scour depth, the spur structures successfully kept the entire scour positions a distance from the embankment to achieve the goal of protection

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Due to the steep terrain and the heavy rainfall, the rivers in Taiwan are fast-flowing with high discharge. Many steep slope watersheds are severely eroded by rivers during the typhoon seasons because of the loose soils. Sediment concentration and riverbed erosion are always critical issues which must be faced. The toe scour problem, especially in river bends and hydraulic structures, is very common in Taiwan [1]. Bank erosion is induced by the strong flows with the large amount of suspended sediment. Sometimes it even causes serious damage both on bank and hydraulic structures. In many cases of the broken bank, the concave bank is significantly eroded from the severe oblique impact of the flood [2].

Methods
Findings
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call