Abstract
Building a European defence will require a parallel adaptation in NATO's structures: to fit them better to the Alliance's new missions; and to make it easier for the Europeans to utilise NATO assets when the US is not part of an operation. The Kosovo War revealed flaws in the current arrangements. Planning was conducted unilaterally at US-Europe Command (EUCOM) rather than multilaterally at the Supreme Headquarters of the Allied Powers in Europe (SHAPE). Dominated therefore by the US in its military command function, NATO is in other ways too micro-managed by its Council. The tensions and confusion that flow from these arrangements act to the detriment of the military operations themselves. Effective multilateral political supervision of the Alliance's military commands should be restored. And commands should be reorganised along functional rather than geographical lines. These changes should bring greater efficiency and flexibility, and also help to give substance to ambitions for making the European countries less dependent on the US.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
