Abstract

Advances in additive manufacturing (AM) technologies and topology optimization methodologies are enabling sophisticated novel designs for heat exchanger performance. These tools have been demonstrated for development of high-performance heat sinks considering local or component-level performance factors (e.g., heat transfer per volume). To leverage such capabilities in larger-scale energy systems, structured design methodologies are needed that consider system-level factors, such as production cost, cycle-level efficiency, and operational constraints. This study seeks to develop and assess a rational approach for designing thermo-economically optimal heat exchangers for such applications. The methodology is illustrated through development of the Primary Heat Exchanger (PHX) for a supercritical carbon dioxide (sCO2) power cycle recovering exhaust heat from a 6 MW-scale natural gas turbine. The proposed approach begins with a detailed thermodynamic cycle model, which is then extended to account for techno-economics. Next, an optimal PHX heat transfer capacity target is identified, and a high-level geometry is selected based on operating characteristics. This geometry is then divided into repeating 2D prismatic unit cells, for which topology optimization is applied to identify high-performance heat transfer geometries. A key aspect of this process is that the unit cell geometries are optimized using the total PHX mass as the objective function, which represents a surrogate for production cost. This leads to distinct designs compared with approaches that optimize local heat transfer and flow resistance factors. A second topology-optimized design is developed using a representative local thermal-fluid performance objective function and is found to require 1.6× the mass of the design generated with the system-level techno-economic objective for the same unit cell size. Conventional-type PHX designs with simple longitudinally finned tubes are developed for comparison, and are found to require total masses 1.5× or greater than the design obtained with the proposed process. Integrating this approach with detailed additive manufacturing costing models and experimentally validated fabrication constraints can yield a streamlined workflow for HX design for future energy systems.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call