Abstract

This essay is based on several technical works, including Steven J. Brams, Superpower Games: Applying Game Theory to Superpower Conflict (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1985) and Brams and Marek P. Hessel, Threat Power in Sequential International Studies Quarterly 28, no. 1 (March 1984): 15-36, and a number of coauthored papers by Brams and Kilgour: Optimal Deterrence, Social Philosophy & Policy 3, no. 1 (Autumn 1985): 118-135, reprinted in Nuclear Rights/Nuclear Wrongs, ed. Ellen Frankel Paul et al. (London: Basil Blackwell, 1 986), pp. 1 18-135; The Path to Stable Deterrence, in Dynamic Models of International Conflict, ed. Urs Luterbacher and Michael D. Ward (Boulder: Lynne Rienner, 1985), pp. 11-25; Rational Deescalation, in Evolution, Games, and Learning: Models for Adaptation in Machines and Nature, Physica 16D, ed. Burton Wendroff (Amsterdam: North Holland, 1986); Notes on Arms-Control Verification: A Game-Theoretic Analysis, in Modeling and Analysis of Arms-Control Problems, ed. Rudolf Avenhaus and Reiner K. Huber (Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, forthcoming 1986); Verification and Stability: A Game-Theoretic Analysis; Winding Down if Preemption or Escalation Occurs: A GameTheoretic Analysis of Star Wars. Also relevant is a paper coauthored by Brams, Kilgour, Rudolf Avenhaus, and John Fichtner, The Probability of Nuclear War. Extensive citations to the literature on nuclear conflict are included in these sources.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call